ViperaAspis wrote:
He's referring to a belief in 'paganism'. For example, there is a nice lady here in accounting, sweet, older, very kind, who is pagan and openly admits to being a witch. If she read this article she might take offense if they just said "Witches are bad, M'kay?".
So he's saying 'we acknowledge people's right... yadda yadda' as a disclaimer so as not to offend those who see witchcraft as a good thing.
I don't think he was, because it seems strange to equate the Nigerian understanding of 'witch' with the 'pagan' understanding, when they are blatantly two different things. I inferred from what he said that he felt it was not a good thing for people of one culture to attempt to discourage another culture's beliefs.
ViperaAspis wrote:
I'm in no hurry to burn our Accounting lady, she's one of the nicest ones here. Maybe if she screws up my paycheck
What I was meaning to say was that, if there are witches and they are causing illness and mayhem within your community, then the logical thing to do is to run them from the community. There is a big difference between this Nigerian idea of 'witch' and the 'pagan' idea of 'witch' (at least, I don't believe your accounting lady is causing mayhem through her sorcerous powers).
I do not mean it should be that all who are labelled witches should be treated abusively. I was trying to say that, if there were things which fitted the Nigerian description of 'witch' then it would make sense for the Nigerians to get rid of them. The best way to tackle the problem of this happening would be to educate people, to show them there are no witches (or to teach the children not to fear brooms).