Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

Rok
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 161
Location: Round Rock, TX

09 May 2009, 6:36 am

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... TE=DEFAULT

I came across this and found it to be interesting. What's your input?



whitetiger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,702
Location: Oregon

09 May 2009, 9:49 am

I read it and I think a lot of those kids were misdiagnosed to begin with. Also, although they appear normal now, they may still have traits that cause problems later. Who knows?


_________________
I am a very strange female.

http://www.youtube.com/user/whitetigerdream

Don't take life so seriously. It isn't permanent!


notbrianna
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 175
Location: somewhere in New England

09 May 2009, 11:37 am

Does anybody else notice how these are mostly under the age of ten? I'm not trying to poo all over what they have managed to achieve but they are fairly young. Certain social blunders are more forgivable when they are made by small children.



demeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 728

09 May 2009, 11:52 am

I think the question to be asked is what are they defining as recovery. If they define it as simply being able to speak/communicate verbally and are willing to try to get into social situations then yes, these children have recovered. If it is defined as being NT, then I have to say that they probably have not recovered.

I think it is possible to move up (and down the spectrum) depending on education, health care, life events, etc. These children may have recovered but recovery can simply mean moving from LFA to AS.

I agree with the scientists that although this phenomena is interesting, there still a lot of research that needs to be done.



Bluestocking
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 245

09 May 2009, 5:06 pm

Look to who they're looking to for information: Autism Speaks. That throws any legitimacy out the window.



CrinklyCrustacean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

11 May 2009, 1:02 pm

Why all the antipathy towards Autism Speaks? While I agree that calling it a breakthrough is a little premature I don't see what the charity has done to deserve your comment.



Relyt22
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 73

11 May 2009, 7:55 pm

CrinklyCrustacean wrote:
Why all the antipathy towards Autism Speaks? While I agree that calling it a breakthrough is a little premature I don't see what the charity has done to deserve your comment.


If I'm not mistaken, aren't the members of "Autism Speaks" the same people who still insist that vaccines cause autism? They're kind of an organization based on "celebrity doctors", you know, celebrities promoting something while using pseudo-science to back up their theories.

As for "recovering" from autism... Like just about any kind of barrier for children, they can learn to work through their barrier. Often times it takes help from a professional, maybe a counselor or a therapist. They still have traits, like was said, which will probably stick with them until death, but things such as social awkwardness and organizational problems can be overcome.