Quote:
When my son was in fifth grade we were called in for a conference with his teacher about a book report that he turned in. The teacher was concerned about our son because he either missed the whole 'obvious' point of the book or 'rebelled' against the books message and the teacher thought it was insubordination because our son is great with reading comprehension. The book was about this outcast type boy who wore different clothes, listened to different music, had long hair, a facial piercing... things like that. Throughout the book everyone fought to change him and he resisted. At this point in the conferee, I was interested in this story... kind of liking the charater... he was, in my opinion, a neat artsy type (much like my son). The teacher then showed us the end of the book. The character was wearing short hair, no face jewelry, some uniform looking outfit... standing in a group of kids who were simply carbon copies of him, planning to play football. The teacher went on about fitting in being important. I asked if it important enough to kill the spirit and personality of a child so that they can be what you want them to be. But what do I know... I think the world is crazy and I think most people are dreadful. Why would I want to be a part of that? Being an individual is, me thinks, the way to go.
you raise a good point, this character, although considered an outcast, might be the smartest of all the characters, and by the group changing him he looses this, you son is very smart, (i take it he is say, 10, 11) he is already commenting on our, or your society.
you say that being an individual is the way to go, i agree, but what i dont agree with is most schools having this oxymoron, fit in AND be an in dividual.
also, i dont understand how your son expressing himself through a book was "rebeling", although he may have been questioning what the teacher told him to do, i dont think it was insubordination.
p.s. thanks for replying