Why do people on this forum always side with women?

Page 12 of 13 [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

27 Feb 2016, 7:39 pm

100000fireflies wrote:
Your repeated SHOUTIng replies on this page strongly seems this is not about sly and is about a nerve hit based on prior conversations or things said -to you-.

You seem unaware of this, but sly has already adamantly stated that he is not depressed. I offered to send him (no cost to him) a few over the counter anti-depressants that might help, since even if depressed, he refuses meds in fear he'd lose his guns, but again, though you keep referring to him as depressed, he does not. Wilbur previously and gently suggested it and encouraged anti-depressants - as one of a pile of possible things to try. However, you seem to have dropped in on the conversation and interpreted it as the first, which it is far from, and blast out everyone in your path because of -your- history. The context here is sly, not you.

Meanwhile, you then reply with a few suggestions to him that have already been said, more than once, by more than one person and turned down. Again, there is a lot of history you seem to have missed.

I truly believe sly is depressed. Having lived through it somehow for many years and many meds and a shedload of misery, as stated in the other post, allows one to spot it in others. Having been stuck in it allows one to see ways it can pull you under and perpetuate itself (e.g. it saps all energy and life..so trying to fight it, you have nothing to fight with). That doesn't mean i know what will make him better. All i do know, the same as wilbur, is depression, unaddressed, unless you're lucky (in which case it'd already be gone), is a beast and won't just go away. There are 100 different things that may help it and, as mentioned, you may still be left with ect and even it's not magic. But the only way it is guaranteed not to change is if it is not treated at all. At which point, you have to try something, or just give up.

You're suddenly shouting at me about tough love when i never said, nor implied anything about 'tough love' in my post - nor would i ever say it was any version of a treatment --for depression-- (again, sly says He is not depressed). Clearly you've been through s**t from people and people have said some pretty crappy things. And i admire anyone who wants to stick up for another. But perhaps step back for a minute, put aside the hit nerve, and review this in context -about sly- and what is actually being said as well as the existence of previous conversations you are unaware of - not just things that were said to you.

I don't think it's possible to diagnose someone on the internet. It does seem he might be thinking about his lack of a relationship constantly and that can definitely turn into depression. My depression is not a direct analogy to sly, and I never intended it to be. I don't know if sly is depressed. I don't know if SSRI's will help him with his problem. I've never felt they helped me all that much, so it's hard for me to advocate them as a solution. All I know is the people who are attacking Sly are not helping but harming him more. I don't f*****g care how "frustrated" they are over him not taking their advice, they are making things far worse. It isn't justified, period. I don't understand how so many people are defending bullying here. I really don't care what the context is. I just don't. You are free to ignore Sly if he annoys you. You have your own life. There is no justification for attack.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

27 Feb 2016, 9:50 pm

marshall wrote:
Honestly though, that kind of thing just doesn't work with some people. I think most people who struggle need to have some form of real success to feel better about themselves. An activity where chance is a huge factor isn't a good one for building confidence. There are simply too many variables. I personally think it is better to have a few things you can have immediate success with. I like lifting weights. If I do it I am slowly able to do more repetitions and heavier weights. I can measure the progress. It's not like dating (or looking for a job) where you're often rejected over and over again and there seems to be no progress, until suddenly you get lucky. I'm just telling the truth here. I can't help that I'm more of a realist than most people. It seems to put me at a disadvantage because the usual "think positive" and other cheer-leading stuff just doesn't work for me if I don't have real tangible results.


I'm not a think positive type of person myself, not everything is going to work out, you are going to get rejected and it is going to hurt-- this is inevitable. My point is, it's a matter of perception. You got rejected, but, did you learn something in the interaction? Perhaps you learned what notto do. Unlike weightlifting, failing to push the last rep is still progress when we're talking about learned behavior. My philosophy on social interaction is this: if variations of logic fail, just start throwing random s**t at the dart board until something sticks-- I mean hell, what else you gonna do? If you're afraid of being seen as a fool or a jackass or whatever, chances are people probably see that lack of confidence and see it anyways, so what have you got to lose?

The thing about confidence is it's just an act: you hold your body a bit different, you talk a bit different, and you expect a little more out of other people when they interact with you...that's all it is. You don't even need to "feel" it, just act it. You act it enough times and it becomes natural. It's not a lie or a falsehood, or any change in your character or even attitude, it's merely a different presentation you're giving people.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

27 Feb 2016, 10:15 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
marshall wrote:
Honestly though, that kind of thing just doesn't work with some people. I think most people who struggle need to have some form of real success to feel better about themselves. An activity where chance is a huge factor isn't a good one for building confidence. There are simply too many variables. I personally think it is better to have a few things you can have immediate success with. I like lifting weights. If I do it I am slowly able to do more repetitions and heavier weights. I can measure the progress. It's not like dating (or looking for a job) where you're often rejected over and over again and there seems to be no progress, until suddenly you get lucky. I'm just telling the truth here. I can't help that I'm more of a realist than most people. It seems to put me at a disadvantage because the usual "think positive" and other cheer-leading stuff just doesn't work for me if I don't have real tangible results.

I'm not a think positive type of person myself, not everything is going to work out, you are going to get rejected and it is going to hurt-- this is inevitable. My point is, it's a matter of perception. You got rejected, but, did you learn something in the interaction? Perhaps you learned what notto do.

In think this is totally unhelpful in reality you do not learn anything from rejection. Trying to think of possible things you did wrong will only make you feel more paranoid and less confident. You can't know what you did wrong. Often it's something you have no control over. Finding a match is a matter of chance. Thinking about what you might have done wrong will make you feel worse. If you're already feeling bad you'll come up with the worst reasons. You can't really learn anything, because you can't know.

Quote:
Unlike weightlifting, failing to push the last rep is still progress when we're talking about learned behavior. My philosophy on social interaction is this: if variations of logic fail, just start throwing random s**t at the dart board until something sticks-- I mean hell, what else you gonna do? If you're afraid of being seen as a fool or a jackass or whatever, chances are people probably see that lack of confidence and see it anyways, so what have you got to lose?

With social interaction you can't always see your progress because you don't always see results. There are too many variables. That's what I'm getting at. You can be confident and still get rejected. Sometimes it's something else. You never know exactly. That's just the way it is.

Quote:
The thing about confidence is it's just an act: you hold your body a bit different, you talk a bit different, and you expect a little more out of other people when they interact with you...that's all it is. You don't even need to "feel" it, just act it. You act it enough times and it becomes natural. It's not a lie or a falsehood, or any change in your character or even attitude, it's merely a different presentation you're giving people.

I think we've begun using one word for a variety of things. This is confusing. People often use the word "confidence" as a synonym for good self-esteem, but now you're talking about something different. You're talking about the ability to "act" confident, which is something entirely different. An aspie with good self-esteem will often "appear" not confident because we just aren't wired to be the spontaneous smooth-talker types. NTs often assume those who are quiet lack confidence simply because there's a bias against quiet people in our culture. Finding a partner is more about finding someone without this bias than it is about changing yourself in impossible ways. Thinking you have to change yourself in impossible ways is just going to make you feel worse. It will undermine your self-esteem and make you feel less confident. The more you think about doing this and doing that to "appear" confident, the more nervous you'll be and the less confident you'll be. This kind of standard common advice that you give just doesn't work in practice.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

27 Feb 2016, 10:50 pm

I'm not sure I totally disagree with you, Aristophanes, actually. I think maybe the goal should just be to practice talking to women casually. Not asking them out. To get better you have to take the pressure off. I'm just against trying to hyper-analyze everything you do or trying to act like a different person. That is extremely counterproductive.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

28 Feb 2016, 1:13 am

Since we seem to have drifted into suggestions for Sly, I vote that he learn to do something social, like shooting pool or throwing darts, and start doing it at the local bar. This pretty much forces you to talk to people, and some of those people will be women. I'm not even talking about trying to pick anyone up or anything, in fact I'd actively recommend against that, just play the game and chat with whoever you happen to meet.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Idealist
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 443
Location: Edinburgh

28 Feb 2016, 2:15 am

I don't really choose sides, certainly not one based on gender. Instead, I usually analyze the situation thoroughly, and then attempt to rationalize it as best I can before proceeding. If not, then I'll probably hold off on posting until other Members have put forward their insight.

I think there are a large number of factors in play that prevent me from rushing to the defense of every women that might seemingly be in distress. And shockingly, I'm not going to go over them. 8O


_________________
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment, but the last step on the path to salvation.

Idealist wrote:
My Autism was cured/treated in late childhood (this makes me a walking, talking, contradiction to 90% of the Forum who all believe Autism is incurable)


100000fireflies
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jan 2016
Age: 123
Posts: 552

28 Feb 2016, 4:41 am

marshall wrote:
I don't think it's possible to diagnose someone on the internet. It does seem he might be thinking about his lack of a relationship constantly and that can definitely turn into depression. My depression is not a direct analogy to sly, and I never intended it to be. I don't know if sly is depressed. I don't know if SSRI's will help him with his problem. I've never felt they helped me all that much, so it's hard for me to advocate them as a solution. All I know is the people who are attacking Sly are not helping but harming him more. I don't f*****g care how "frustrated" they are over him not taking their advice, they are making things far worse. It isn't justified, period. I don't understand how so many people are defending bullying here. I really don't care what the context is. I just don't. You are free to ignore Sly if he annoys you. You have your own life. There is no justification for attack.


Yes, very true. Based on posts throughout the forum, I think he is. But he says he's not, so i have to go with that.
However, if he or anyone were, i also agree that i too have no idea which of the med and non-med treatments would help. I only know of studied and anecdotal options and what has and (mostly) hasn't worked for me..but what will work for another..it's all a trial.

To be clear, i don't find sly annoying. I posted why i may get frustrated and it has zero to do with finding him annoying, nor not taking my advice. If i just found them annoying, i wouldn't care enough to remotely feel frustrated.

My point of context was simply that i don't think anything said was done with malicious intent (i.e. bullying/abusive/attack). You may be correct that what was said/how it was said is more harmful than not. Or it may not be as different people respond to different things in different ways. Ultimately though, i brought it up just that i don't think so many people here are defending bullying as, i know my intention and what i have read historically from wilbur, and what all she ended up saying, no matter how it came out or why, i really don't think her intention was that either.


_________________
"When does the human cost become too high for the building of a better machine?"


Monkeydoo
Butterfly
Butterfly

Joined: 27 Feb 2016
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16

28 Feb 2016, 10:21 am

I second the vote for sly doing something social - I vote for join a team at his local gun club.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

28 Feb 2016, 5:55 pm

marshall wrote:
I'm not sure I totally disagree with you, Aristophanes, actually. I think maybe the goal should just be to practice talking to women casually. Not asking them out. To get better you have to take the pressure off. I'm just against trying to hyper-analyze everything you do or trying to act like a different person. That is extremely counterproductive.


Absolutely.

Men often hear that they need to be "more confident," but I think it would be better if certain men just practiced their social skills and to learned to become more relaxed around other people.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

28 Feb 2016, 9:16 pm

Its simple, life is not fair, society lives in the illusion that only women are good and all men are bad guys, regardless of the nasty heartless women that even other women see as mean, cold and heartless. Its just the way it is, until society makes a change that is always how things will be.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


Idealist
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 443
Location: Edinburgh

28 Feb 2016, 9:35 pm

AspieOtaku wrote:
Its simple, life is not fair, society lives in the illusion that only women are good and all men are bad guys, regardless of the nasty heartless women that even other women see as mean, cold and heartless. Its just the way it is, until society makes a change that is always how things will be.

Scotland is fairly equal in it's gender views, so don't lump us into your unique worldview.


_________________
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment, but the last step on the path to salvation.

Idealist wrote:
My Autism was cured/treated in late childhood (this makes me a walking, talking, contradiction to 90% of the Forum who all believe Autism is incurable)


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 Feb 2016, 9:42 pm

100000fireflies wrote:
Yes, very true. Based on posts throughout the forum, I think he is. But he says he's not, so i have to go with that.

However, if he or anyone were, i also agree that i too have no idea which of the med and non-med treatments would help. I only know of studied and anecdotal options and what has and (mostly) hasn't worked for me..but what will work for another..it's all a trial.

To be clear, i don't find sly annoying. I posted why i may get frustrated and it has zero to do with finding him annoying, nor not taking my advice. If i just found them annoying, i wouldn't care enough to remotely feel frustrated.

My point of context was simply that i don't think anything said was done with malicious intent (i.e. bullying/abusive/attack). You may be correct that what was said/how it was said is more harmful than not. Or it may not be as different people respond to different things in different ways. Ultimately though, i brought it up just that i don't think so many people here are defending bullying as, i know my intention and what i have read historically from wilbur, and what all she ended up saying, no matter how it came out or why, i really don't think her intention was that either.

I don't really want to talk about this anymore. It looked like an attack from my perspective and I reacted badly. I'm okay with you, but I don't know if I'll ever get along with wilburforce.



Deltaville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 941
Location: SystemShock Universe

28 Feb 2016, 10:11 pm

marshall wrote:
100000fireflies wrote:
Yes, very true. Based on posts throughout the forum, I think he is. But he says he's not, so i have to go with that.

However, if he or anyone were, i also agree that i too have no idea which of the med and non-med treatments would help. I only know of studied and anecdotal options and what has and (mostly) hasn't worked for me..but what will work for another..it's all a trial.

To be clear, i don't find sly annoying. I posted why i may get frustrated and it has zero to do with finding him annoying, nor not taking my advice. If i just found them annoying, i wouldn't care enough to remotely feel frustrated.

My point of context was simply that i don't think anything said was done with malicious intent (i.e. bullying/abusive/attack). You may be correct that what was said/how it was said is more harmful than not. Or it may not be as different people respond to different things in different ways. Ultimately though, i brought it up just that i don't think so many people here are defending bullying as, i know my intention and what i have read historically from wilbur, and what all she ended up saying, no matter how it came out or why, i really don't think her intention was that either.

I don't really want to talk about this anymore. It looked like an attack from my perspective and I reacted badly. I'm okay with you, but I don't know if I'll ever get along with wilburforce.


I think, from what I can conjecture, is that wilburforce overcame her difficulties in a manner that she feels she is satisfied with and has come to the conclusion that others who have not yet bypassed their difficulties are either lacking in willpower or psychological strength.


_________________
Sebastian

"Don't forget to floss." - Darkwing Duck


Kyle Katarn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2015
Age: 30
Posts: 1,181

29 Feb 2016, 1:13 am

They don't side with women--it's just an illusion.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

29 Feb 2016, 2:34 am

marshall wrote:
I'm not sure I totally disagree with you, Aristophanes, actually. I think maybe the goal should just be to practice talking to women casually. Not asking them out. To get better you have to take the pressure off. I'm just against trying to hyper-analyze everything you do or trying to act like a different person. That is extremely counterproductive.

You may be right on my use of the word confidence, but i have a reason for pushing it. I'm a believer in uncanny valley theory applying to humans. I think most autistics that are "passing" are also probably slightly off from "normal", just enough to tease an NT instinct that something's not quite right-- like deja vu, or "vibes". That's why most autistics have problems honing down specific problems in interaction and NT's can't really tell you what's wrong if they're trying to be helpful-- they don't even know why they feel that way. The reason I'm big on confidence is that if you give people a sense you're secure in yourself, it helps ease some of that uncanny valley tension in them.

That's why i view it as "presentation" and not a personality change, it really is just a few alterations. I mean confidence gives the sense you know what's going on, but let's face it, a meteor could hit you tonight and all the confidence in the world wouldn't stop it. It is a completely illogical thing I myself don't actually "feel", but i can play it and it does make interaction much easier. It's just what people expect and if you want to do well with people, you give them what they want.



100000fireflies
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jan 2016
Age: 123
Posts: 552

29 Feb 2016, 3:35 am

Aristophanes wrote:
marshall wrote:
I'm not sure I totally disagree with you, Aristophanes, actually. I think maybe the goal should just be to practice talking to women casually. Not asking them out. To get better you have to take the pressure off. I'm just against trying to hyper-analyze everything you do or trying to act like a different person. That is extremely counterproductive.

You may be right on my use of the word confidence, but i have a reason for pushing it. I'm a believer in uncanny valley theory applying to humans. I think most autistics that are "passing" are also probably slightly off from "normal", just enough to tease an NT instinct that something's not quite right-- like deja vu, or "vibes". That's why most autistics have problems honing down specific problems in interaction and NT's can't really tell you what's wrong if they're trying to be helpful-- they don't even know why they feel that way. The reason I'm big on confidence is that if you give people a sense you're secure in yourself, it helps ease some of that uncanny valley tension in them.

That's why i view it as "presentation" and not a personality change, it really is just a few alterations. I mean confidence gives the sense you know what's going on, but let's face it, a meteor could hit you tonight and all the confidence in the world wouldn't stop it. It is a completely illogical thing I myself don't actually "feel", but i can play it and it does make interaction much easier. It's just what people expect and if you want to do well with people, you give them what they want.


I agree that hyper-analyzing is prone to disaster. But -a bit- of an act, can make sense. Kind of like when you go in for a job interview, you don't want them to see just how anxious you are, but try to present some sense that you can do the job.

I have a theory about people in general, that seems even more prevalent when dating. It goes along with the vibe thing.
Basically, two parts:

1. People believe whatever they pick up on. If they sense a basic level of confidence, they believe there must be a reason for it - i.e. this person has some "value", get to know them more. If they sense zero confidence/severe self-deprecation, they believe there must be a reason for it - i.e. cut the conversation short and do Not date them. This whole thing seems more striking when it comes to a potential date versus just a potential friend. In some ways, i think dating brings out an inner predator that seeks the strong and stomps the weak.

I think this is why 'social engineers', sociopaths, and horribly arrogant people who are actually complete buttheads, get dates.

2. These things easily self-perpetuate. For instance, if we act with just a bit of confidence, we're more likely to get a positive response and with that response, more likely to actually feel that bit..and the interaction cycles in a good way. Which carries over into future conversations. Whereas, if we feel horrible anxious about interacting, they pick up on it and act a bit odd, we pick up on that and feel even more self-conscious and down it goes. Followed by the next conversation where we may feel even more awkward than the last.

Adding to that though is the 'something's weird about that person'. Which, unless it's weird as in makes the hair on your neck stand , i think that sense can be overridden when the person appears happy with themselves (=they're weird, but they're okay) and when not = they're weird and really cut the conversation short.

This of course is all theoretical and put into practice..not quite so easy. But i think if there is a way to find or portray that smidge of confidence - even via a suggestion like dox's of playing darts, i think over time it can really pay off.

I hate captcha!! !! !


_________________
"When does the human cost become too high for the building of a better machine?"