Europe attempts to poison Israel with theralene!

Post Reply New Topic

Either of two things:
1. She does not feel that Jenn's side is important and don't give it a second thought.
2. She already knows about this and are trying to say what she thinks you want to hear.
(Or 3. She doesn't think about Jenn' is a person who has a history too.)

Yes, that is exaclty it. And that is what I am pissed at people about. When ppl dislike someone, they regard that person as "unimportant" and won't give a second thought. A much more fair way of disliking someone is to give them lots of thought, and then put even more thought on why you dislike them. In this case, at least, they can "make up" for your dislike by doing certain things that would put more factors into the equation. But that is not something you would ever see NT-s do. Instead, once you do enough bad things you are regarded as "unimportant", and then you can become SAINT and evne that would be "unimportant" since they won't bother to open their eyes to see that you are a saint.

In case of the Jews, the kind of thing I WANT to see is someone who would insist that Jews killed Jesus Christ and, AT THE SAME TIME insist that in case of Israeli-Palestinian conflict Israel is right and Palestine is wrong. This would be an example of someone who, despite his belief that Jews killed Jesus Christ, does NOT overlook the Jewish side of the story in Israeli Palestinian conflict. But for some reason I am yet to find such a person. In fact, most of the Europeans believe it were Romans who killed Jesus Christ, which makes me hate them even more since its like they don't even think Jews did anything wrong and decided to "overlook" Jews for no reason. This by the way also shows that non-Jewish side is being overlooked as well: namely, the sympathy towards Jewish sufferings during the holocaust causes most people to overlook the biblical account of what happened before Jesus' death.



No thats not the case. I can give you few arguments that show otherwise:

a) At the very beginning when I was telling negative things about Jennifer she did defend her, and I could tell it was done ONLY to please me. So this tells me that I didn't do a very good job hiding the fact that I wanted to hear GOOD things about Jennifer.

b) Right before North Carolina when she switched and started saying a lot of negative things about Jennifer, once she apologised and said "may be I am completely off and now I am misleading you". I then teld her "but don't you remember I was telling you about the same exact thing for the past month", and then she admitted she didn't remember (which by the way is one of the things I said she "ignored", since she ignores whenever Jennifer is a victim). So, as far as her memory is concerned, I never told her anything bad about Jennifer, SHE discovered it all on her own after starting to read Jennifer's email that I have shown her and quickly deletted, and then SHE tried to perswade ME on how bad Jennifer is, in vain.

c) Throughout the year that followed North Carolina, when she became agressive in trying to break us up, she would tell me how easilly Jennifer can mislead me, and was bringing up North Carolina (August) and Christmass (half a year later) where, in both cases, I was mislead, so I better end it with her before she misleads me further. Again, this implies that she forgot that I ever criticized Jennifer. She likewise forgot whenever I used the word "Jennifer said" before my sentence, since whenever I said "Jennifer said XYZ" she would go right at attacking ME for XYZ, even though I said clearly and loudly that Jennifer said it, not me. So, what this tells me is that she knows that I am on Jennifer's side, even though I am hiding it from her.

d) She is less likely to criticize Jennifer when she is happy with me (if she thought it pleases me it would be the opposite). For example, after my defense, which was half a year AFTER North Carolina she was very happy with the way I did it, and it was the ONLY occasion after North Carolina when she told me how good Jennifer is and criticized me for not having given her enough attention after my defense, and tihs is the exact tihng I was trying to get her to do with North Carolina which she refused. So this tells me that, despite my efforts to pretend to feel differetnly, some way or another she knows what I feel; so this rules out the possibility of her criticizing Jennifer because thats what I want to hear.



Yes thats right. In fact, I notice a pattern with her that there are things that SHE cares about, such as my scoliosis and the fact that I have to do Yoga or swim in order to get rid of it. And she pushes me and pushes me for years to sign up for yoga. But if something is not one of the things she cares about, and instead the interest is comming from me (after all, as much as I criticized Jennifer it is still true that I was the one who found her to start with), then it is completely unimportant.

By the way, do you know that in Israel the Messianic Jews (the Jews that believe in Jesus) are under attack from regular Jews. Now, of course, the number of Jews that are openly violent towards Messianic Jews are fewer than 50%. But what the rest of the Jews are guilty of is of IGNORING Messianic Jews and FORGETTING to defend them. When Messianic Jews complain to police about the violence that they experience, the best response that they get is that they will "look into it" and then as the time passes, police never "gets around" to look at it, because there are too many other cases. Then, while they get no response and the violence keeps happening, they will go to the police again and again, and eventually police will tell them to "stop bothering them". Then, there was one Messianic Jew who got fed up with all the violence that he got from regular Jews FOR YEARS, and he finally decided to fight back. Guess what, the next day HE (the Messianic Jew) was arrested for violence.

Now the moral of the story: the orthodox Jews are trying to poison Messianic Jews with theralene, which is very similar to the way Europe tries to poison regular Jews with theralene. The non-response that Messianic Jews were getting when they were trying to complain about the attacks that they got is very similar to the non-response that regular Jews were getting during World War 2. On the other hand, the way a Messianic Jew was arrested for violence when he fought back is very similar to the way Europe opposes Israel when Israel fights back.

Both cases of course are similar to the way my mom treats Jennifer. Before North Carolina when I was attacking Jennifer my mom (who is Jewish) refused to defend her (and Jennifer is Christian), just like Israeli police refuses to defend Messianic Jews . Then when that particular Messianic Jew fought back, it was very similar to the way Jennifer fought back. And in both cases the person who fought back was punished: Messianic Jew was punished for being "violent" and Jennifer is punished for being "controlling". Both cases are similar to how Europe treats Israel. At first there was non-response during WW2 and then, right now when Israel decided to defend itself, Israel is blamed as agressor.