MrDiamondMind
Deinonychus
Joined: 13 Mar 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 371
Location: Encapsulated within a skull; covered in sheets of skin
02 Jul 2010, 5:06 pm
02 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
02 Jul 2010, 8:18 pm
02 Jul 2010, 9:27 pm
02 Jul 2010, 9:33 pm
Janissy wrote:
A man got an obvious joke but he may miss the less obvious ones.
Life is definately a bleak hellscape.
Life is definately a bleak hellscape.
I didn't understand you until I looked to the top left of my screen and realized that this is posted in the haven.
02 Jul 2010, 11:16 pm
02 Jul 2010, 11:43 pm
Ok. I started this thread, so I'll see your inane responses and try my best to respond. Not that you gave me the effort beyond a knee-jerk, but that's just the kind of person I am.
Quote:
LMAO? IQ isn't a definite measure of intelligence, and AFAIK below 120 isn't mentally ret*d either. It's around the 70 mark and below that one is considered mentally handicapped.
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
Please don't troll in my thread. No s**t IQ isn't a good measurement. Who the hell said it was? Using it to ball park something as complex as intelligence is just something some people do sometimes. It's like talking in miles even though I live in kilometers. It's a system which many people know of as a general rule. Reactionary much? Thanks for wasting my time in general. The rest of your post is just as irrelevant as that, but I'm gonna give you room to figure it out.
Except that part about driving. That's just mean. I know I could drive if I put enough effort into it. And one of the most amazing geniuses I know can drive, it's just a bit scary when he does.
Quote:
I respect a person of normal or below normal intelligence who understands what they don't understand more than a person of above normal intelligence who overstates his/her knowledge/understanding of the world.
I think 90% of intelligence is the ability to *know* when you *don't know* what the hell you're talking about.
I think 90% of intelligence is the ability to *know* when you *don't know* what the hell you're talking about.
Me too. If this is a veiled insult at anyone here (including me), I am very disappointed in you. It would suggest you have failed to grasp the basic meaning of the topic, and then proceeded to troll.
God. Will you aspies please stop arguing with people who agree with you? It's really lame. We shouldn't be fighting each other. I don't know about you, but I get so much s**t from people irl, I don't intend to pass that on to my WP friends.
Thanks, Sunshower. Don't underestimate yourself. Start using your mind, explore yourself fully. You might find it's a lot more capable than you ever imagined.
02 Jul 2010, 11:49 pm
eagletalon86 wrote:
LMAO? IQ isn't a definite measure of intelligence, and AFAIK below 120 isn't mentally ret*d either. It's around the 70 mark and below that one is considered mentally handicapped.
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
I don't see how this is a troll post as the OP claimed. Why? Because you made a very good point and corrected her about what mental retardation really is. And that is trolling?
Man that word sure gets misused and thrown around here. If people don't agree with what someone said nor liked what they said, they call them a troll. If they get offended easily, they are called a troll. Now pointing out peoples mistakes, they are called a troll.
03 Jul 2010, 12:02 am
League_Girl wrote:
eagletalon86 wrote:
LMAO? IQ isn't a definite measure of intelligence, and AFAIK below 120 isn't mentally ret*d either. It's around the 70 mark and below that one is considered mentally handicapped.
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
I don't see how this is a troll post as the OP claimed. Why? Because you made a very good point and corrected her about what mental retardation really is. And that is trolling?
Man that word sure gets misused and thrown around here. If people don't agree with what someone said nor liked what they said, they call them a troll. If they get offended easily, they are called a troll. Now pointing out peoples mistakes, they are called a troll.
Please.. please read. It's trolling because whatever he thinks I said... I didn't say it. It's trolling because we are already in agreement. It's trolling because he's not trying to understand the actual content before he... "corrects".
And I would now consider you a troll for the same reasons. Thanks for compounding the BS into an even denser form of BS. Now if someone responds based off your post we'll have a veritable shitpile forming. Won't it be grand? Let's do it! Let's just alllllllll talk out of our asses! YAY.
YAY FOR GIANT SHITPILES OF IRRELEVANT POSTS. WHO EVEN CARES ABOUT REALITY AS LONG AS WE LOOK INDIGNANT? HOOORAAAHHH FOR ONLINE EGOBOOSTS!
03 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Apx wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
eagletalon86 wrote:
LMAO? IQ isn't a definite measure of intelligence, and AFAIK below 120 isn't mentally ret*d either. It's around the 70 mark and below that one is considered mentally handicapped.
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
One person with an IQ of 150 can't drive, yet another with an IQ of 100 does it just fine. Who's more adept?
I don't see how this is a troll post as the OP claimed. Why? Because you made a very good point and corrected her about what mental retardation really is. And that is trolling?
Man that word sure gets misused and thrown around here. If people don't agree with what someone said nor liked what they said, they call them a troll. If they get offended easily, they are called a troll. Now pointing out peoples mistakes, they are called a troll.
Please.. please read. It's trolling because whatever he thinks I said... I didn't say it. It's trolling because we are already in agreement. It's trolling because he's not trying to understand the actual content before he... "corrects".
And I would now consider you a troll for the same reasons. Thanks for compounding the BS into an even denser form of BS. Now if someone responds based off your post we'll have a veritable shitpile forming. Won't it be grand? Let's do it! Let's just alllllllll talk out of our asses! YAY.
YAY FOR GIANT SHITPILES OF IRRELEVANT POSTS. WHO EVEN CARES ABOUT REALITY AS LONG AS WE LOOK INDIGNANT? HOOORAAAHHH FOR ONLINE EGOBOOSTS!
Ah I see, whoever doesn't agree with you is a troll. Got it. Now I shall assume you're a troll.
Now instead of throwing that word around, why not try and explain what you are talking about because not everyone reads things the same way you do. You may make a post and other people may read it and not interpret the way you had it. It does not make them trolls. If you read through their posts, you will see they are regular people here. They are not here to start fights or cause trouble.
03 Jul 2010, 12:46 am
03 Jul 2010, 12:58 am
Apx wrote:
Look, I respect the sentiment there, but I was very clear just then.
Me: It's trolling because we are already in agreement.
You: Ah I see, whoever doesn't agree with you is a troll.
What I meant there is that I do agree with him. How is that hard to read? Is agreement too big a word?
Please don't put this down to reading differently. Maybe by differently you mean varying degrees of EFFORT. In which case I agree entirely. Your lack of comprehension stuns and saddens me. Please get it this time.
Me: It's trolling because we are already in agreement.
You: Ah I see, whoever doesn't agree with you is a troll.
What I meant there is that I do agree with him. How is that hard to read? Is agreement too big a word?
Please don't put this down to reading differently. Maybe by differently you mean varying degrees of EFFORT. In which case I agree entirely. Your lack of comprehension stuns and saddens me. Please get it this time.
I am sorry if I didn't comprehend your post, that does not make me a troll. There are people with disabilities here who do have reading comprehension problems but that does not make them a troll. Plenty of people with mental illnesses and disabilities are called trolls even though anyone can be called one. Also the word gets misused by people for the reasons I have already listed.
What I was focused on was you calling him a troll and it is against the rules here BTW to call other members trolls but I didn't go reporting it to the mods. I let this one slide.
03 Jul 2010, 1:00 am
03 Jul 2010, 1:06 am
03 Jul 2010, 1:08 am
League_Girl wrote:
Apx wrote:
Look, I respect the sentiment there, but I was very clear just then.
Me: It's trolling because we are already in agreement.
You: Ah I see, whoever doesn't agree with you is a troll.
What I meant there is that I do agree with him. How is that hard to read? Is agreement too big a word?
Please don't put this down to reading differently. Maybe by differently you mean varying degrees of EFFORT. In which case I agree entirely. Your lack of comprehension stuns and saddens me. Please get it this time.
Me: It's trolling because we are already in agreement.
You: Ah I see, whoever doesn't agree with you is a troll.
What I meant there is that I do agree with him. How is that hard to read? Is agreement too big a word?
Please don't put this down to reading differently. Maybe by differently you mean varying degrees of EFFORT. In which case I agree entirely. Your lack of comprehension stuns and saddens me. Please get it this time.
I am sorry if I didn't comprehend your post, that does not make me a troll. There are people with disabilities here who do have reading comprehension problems but that does not make them a troll. Plenty of people with mental illnesses and disabilities are called trolls even though anyone can be called one. Also the word gets misused by people for the reasons I have already listed.
What I was focused on was you calling him a troll and it is against the rules here BTW to call other members trolls but I didn't go reporting it to the mods. I let this one slide.
Ok. Well, thank you. My lesson learned.
You really should be careful about bagging on other members if you have reading comprehension issues. It's really not fair on other members. A good rule to go by is just avoid saying anything bad about anyone, which I stick to myself, because of my own perception issues. UNLESS PROVOKED.
03 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| A Newly Identified Species of Human May Have Been More Smart |
06 Dec 2024, 3:30 pm |
| What Are The "Non-Obvious" Signs Someone Is Super Smart? |
17 Nov 2024, 8:34 am |
| Stupid Songs |
11 Feb 2025, 12:20 pm |
| Why is The Stupid Cupid 1944 the Worst LT Short? |
05 Jan 2025, 12:01 pm |
