scale of -10 to +10, how do you feel right now?
6 or 7? I'm a little hungry... and I'm nervous as I'll be going to an apartment showing for the first time today. Not that I can buy one yet, but this one is nearby so I thought I could practice a little so that I wouldn't be so anxious when I'll actually start looking for real.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
In what context? I wouldn't expect people who disagree with you to help you make your case during ideological discussions, they have their own case to make. If your case and framing doesn't support the positions anyone else has laid out, it's unlikely that individuals from either side will see a benefit in supporting your points. Generally speaking, when you see things in orange and blue, trying to explain to people who see in black and white why they're wrong will be a tiring experience.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
In what context? I wouldn't expect people who disagree with you to help you make your case during ideological discussions, they have their own case to make. If your case and framing doesn't support the positions anyone else has laid out, it's unlikely that individuals from either side will see a benefit in supporting your points. Generally speaking, when you see things in orange and blue, trying to explain to people who see in black and white why they're wrong will be a tiring experience.
If I saw two wp people gaining up on a liberal member I would join in and bash them too. It’s called kindness and compassion.
People here are no different then high school bullies.
_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
In what context? I wouldn't expect people who disagree with you to help you make your case during ideological discussions, they have their own case to make. If your case and framing doesn't support the positions anyone else has laid out, it's unlikely that individuals from either side will see a benefit in supporting your points. Generally speaking, when you see things in orange and blue, trying to explain to people who see in black and white why they're wrong will be a tiring experience.
If I saw two wp people gaining up on a liberal member I would join in and bash them too. It’s called kindness and compassion.
People here are no different then high school bullies.
You wouldn't join in on the side that's not as strong simply because they're weaker, you'd join in on the side you agree on - just like you consistently do on here. It's called integrity and consistency.
It would be unfair for anyone on here to expect you to take a pro-gun control stance just because in one hypothetical argument that side isn't being argued very well - I would expect you to continue to espouse the position you feel is correct, because that's what you sincerely believe is right. Political arguments aren't like competitive sports where the competition is the goal, so ensuring the teams are balanced defeats the purpose, sometimes one position consistently makes a better case and their opponents will repeatedly appear to have lost. Inferior ideas should lose support over time, if they weren't inferior better arguments for them would exist.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.

Good Luck , hoping the best for you adventure in being in your own place.
_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
In what context? I wouldn't expect people who disagree with you to help you make your case during ideological discussions, they have their own case to make. If your case and framing doesn't support the positions anyone else has laid out, it's unlikely that individuals from either side will see a benefit in supporting your points. Generally speaking, when you see things in orange and blue, trying to explain to people who see in black and white why they're wrong will be a tiring experience.
If I saw two wp people gaining up on a liberal member I would join in and bash them too. It’s called kindness and compassion.
People here are no different then high school bullies.
You wouldn't join in on the side that's not as strong simply because they're weaker, you'd join in on the side you agree on - just like you consistently do on here. It's called integrity and consistency.
It would be unfair for anyone on here to expect you to take a pro-gun control stance just because in one hypothetical argument that side isn't being argued very well - I would expect you to continue to espouse the position you feel is correct, because that's what you sincerely believe is right. Political arguments aren't like competitive sports where the competition is the goal, so ensuring the teams are balanced defeats the purpose, sometimes one position consistently makes a better case and their opponents will repeatedly appear to have lost. Inferior ideas should lose support over time, if they weren't inferior better arguments for them would exist.
I wouldn’t join in and I don’t. I don’t want to gang up on anyone like bully.
Especially when said gaming up are are doing more bashing and slandering then arguing.throwing insults at the person.
If you were walking and saw 2 people kicking a person on the ground would you join in?
Cause when it’s 2-3 people ganging up on someone and one joins in that’s same thing. Probably why argument and debates don’t allow such things and require people take turns. It’s why pro gun control people refuse to go to a chat with 10 pro gun people and be banged up on. But as your one of them I don’t Epect such compassion from you. I’m done talking to you i dont know why I did it in first place. I should report you for attacking me, saying my idea are inferior just because wp has more leftist then centrist and rightist.
What’s happening here is 3 people saying “ your dumb, your dumb your dumb” at some guy stuck in a corner.
_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die
No Music........?
Suggested ,John Lennons, " here comes the sun"
Yes. Music never fails to put me in a better mood. Open your eyes, turn on music of your choice, aromatic cup of coffee, open a window and smell the fresh air.
Feeling much better probably 4, the music really helped, especially the ones I did not already know. That bad man or bad guy track is not very upbeat, but is very good. Thankyou
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
In what context? I wouldn't expect people who disagree with you to help you make your case during ideological discussions, they have their own case to make. If your case and framing doesn't support the positions anyone else has laid out, it's unlikely that individuals from either side will see a benefit in supporting your points. Generally speaking, when you see things in orange and blue, trying to explain to people who see in black and white why they're wrong will be a tiring experience.
If I saw two wp people gaining up on a liberal member I would join in and bash them too. It’s called kindness and compassion.
People here are no different then high school bullies.
You wouldn't join in on the side that's not as strong simply because they're weaker, you'd join in on the side you agree on - just like you consistently do on here. It's called integrity and consistency.
It would be unfair for anyone on here to expect you to take a pro-gun control stance just because in one hypothetical argument that side isn't being argued very well - I would expect you to continue to espouse the position you feel is correct, because that's what you sincerely believe is right. Political arguments aren't like competitive sports where the competition is the goal, so ensuring the teams are balanced defeats the purpose, sometimes one position consistently makes a better case and their opponents will repeatedly appear to have lost. Inferior ideas should lose support over time, if they weren't inferior better arguments for them would exist.
I wouldn’t join in and I don’t. I don’t want to gang up on anyone like bully.
Especially when said gaming up are are doing more bashing and slandering then arguing.throwing insults at the person.
If you were walking and saw 2 people kicking a person on the ground would you join in?
Cause when it’s 2-3 people ganging up on someone and one joins in that’s same thing. Probably why argument and debates don’t allow such things and require people take turns. It’s why pro gun control people refuse to go to a chat with 10 pro gun people and be banged up on. But as your one of them I don’t Epect such compassion from you. I’m done talking to you i dont know why I did it in first place. I should report you for attacking me, saying my idea are inferior just because wp has more leftist then centrist and rightist.
What’s happening here is 3 people saying “ your dumb, your dumb your dumb” at some guy stuck in a corner.
I'm not saying "you're dumb, you're dumb, you're dumb". I'm saying I disagree with you.
I'm not attacking you, I'm trying to converse with you.
In those types of threads you tend to get multiple responses because more than one person has a reply and wishes to share their perspective. It's not intentional, malicious ganging up on, it's that their arguments reinforce each other because their perspectives are similar. Regardless of left wing vs. right wing concepts, that's bound to happen when many people agree.
I'm not attacking you by suggesting that if your ideas can't stand up to scrutiny they might be wrong. I think we'd both agree wrong ideas are inferior to correct ones. That's why I said to 'get better arguments', if you're really arguing for the superior position it should be able to be articulated eventually in some way. People aren't doing that to cause you emotional distress, just like when you and people you agree with post those views, it's not just to upset me or people I agree with.
When we disagree I don't disagree with you to antagonize you or because I dislike you. When we disagree it's because we disagree. We're two f*****g ret*ds arguing on the interwebz because we disagree and because for whatever reason we were both given a lovely set of cards to deal with in life and as a result are miserable and unfulfilled. When we disagree on something please don't let it ruin your life. Neither of us has the ability to impose our ideals on the other, nor do we possess the means to impose them upon society. Even when I don't sympathize with you on issues, I empathize with you in terms of your general circumstances because although we have differing perspectives, neither of us chose to be f****d up, we're just stuck dealing with it.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
What happens is they mock me then another comes in and joins in on mocking me.
Though guess that means they can’t argue cause when you mock, slander or insult someone it’s cause you can’t argue against them.
I don’t like being mocked and attacked.
Just cause you disagree with me doesn’t mean I’m wrong or my ideas are or are inferior.
I’m not a professional debater if I was I would t be here. I’d be working for some Congress men or corporation.
Only if scrutiny equals we got a bunch of people together who disagree with you.
Nothing I ever say will change any liberals mind. Obama himself could walk into their home and say I’m right and they’d not change their mind and he’s the lefts savior who can do no wrong.
Only one reason to mock people and that’s to hurt and belittle them
Barely step up from them actively calling me a nazi.
_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die
Sorry but I don’t think you are. A centrist wouldn’t be so anti trump. Centrist by name are neutral. Ersa is a centrist. I only supoort trump in that he’s better the other choices and done good things. You seem to only see the bad he’s done and hopped n the I hate trump train. I worry come his re-election your fully climb on and join in on calling me a racist nazi.

Nothing wrong being a liberal democrat even if I don’t like them much. It’s norm for people from New York City too. Trumps a liberal democrat. I don’t think for a second he’s changed. If they’d let him he’d ran as a democrat and Ben pro illgeal immigrants. Hes a populist. For best or worst. That’s why he sways back and though. So far he’s been ok but there’s been close calls where he goes back to his liberal democrat true self. Probably while some republicans don’t like him. Also if he hadn’t ran he’d been right there beside Hillary taking pictures. They’ve probably still friends I’d bet. You can take the liberal out of nyc but you can’t take the nyc out of the liberal. To make a twist on an old saying.
_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Though guess that means they can’t argue cause when you mock, slander or insult someone it’s cause you can’t argue against them.
I don’t like being mocked and attacked.
Just cause you disagree with me doesn’t mean I’m wrong or my ideas are or are inferior.
I’m not a professional debater if I was I would t be here. I’d be working for some Congress men or corporation.
Only if scrutiny equals we got a bunch of people together who disagree with you.
Nothing I ever say will change any liberals mind. Obama himself could walk into their home and say I’m right and they’d not change their mind and he’s the lefts savior who can do no wrong.
Only one reason to mock people and that’s to hurt and belittle them
Barely step up from them actively calling me a nazi.
Posters should try to refrain being insulting; snark and condescension are common by posters here regardless of their views. We should all refrain from making personal attacks, both because they fail to advance one's case but also because they don't belong in civil discussions. That said, when someone objects strongly to something you say, they're allowed to address it without it being a personal attack, especially if it's something they feel mischaracterizes the concern.
No one here is a professional debater.
Incorrect ideas are less valuable. If you tell a kid chocolate milk is made in a factory by adding chocolate to milk and I say chocolate milk comes from brown cows you're educating them and I'm saying something silly. The idea that chocolate milk comes from brown cows is inferior to a correct understanding of how chocolate milk is made.
For what it's worth, many of the lefties on here would be willing to tell you everything Obama's done wrong. Not all of them, but many.
I think I'm out for the night though.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
3? 4? Something along those lines; I have a tooth ache and I'm tired... I have a dentist's appointment in a bit over an hour and that'll likely help, but I don't like going to a dentist so that doesn't make make me feel better. Plus, I need to take these smelly antibiotics before I go there... I don't normally mind taking any pills, I'm so used to it, but these ones smell so bad.
But well, it's a tooth problem, so in a sense the blame is probably on me anyway. I should just have strict meal times and not eat snacks.
I support some Republican ideas.
To suggest that I would call you a Nazi is absurd.
You’re a smart guy. You have a memory.
Haven’t you noticed when I denounced people who called Republicans Nazis?
My feelings against Trump do not have much to do with my feelings towards conservatives. I didn’t feel such feelings against Reagan, etc. I would have the same feelings if he were a SJW liberal.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
What to do when I feel no need for sleep?
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
31 Jan 2025, 10:04 am |
i feel inhuman
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
18 Jan 2025, 8:14 pm |
Feel like I'm doing something wrong |
08 Jan 2025, 2:47 pm |
confused, don't know how to feel about this convesation |
10 Feb 2025, 5:18 pm |