Men who work retail are just lazy and need to get a real

Page 3 of 3 [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

16 Nov 2015, 2:43 pm

Edenthiel wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
It's biology, women are attracted to security and social capital whereas men are more physical and do not care much about the security/social capital she might bring. If anything, I'd say a lot of guys are intimidated by a woman with a lot of security and social capital. From a logical standpoint, it makes perfect sense. Why would the chooser choose someone that doesn't improve their standing? Nobody wants somebody that they feel will drag them down, it doesn't matter how witty or nice or how much of a good person you are, all that matter is what you bring to the table and for us on the spectrum there isn't much. For a lot of women, there is a mantra of never "dating down" and we're on the bottom so that's that.

I'm pretty sure no actual biological cause has been identified, only posited by researchers living in a culture where such role-based values and assumptions are endemic due to hegemony. You may wish to investigate societies that were traditionally matriarchal or egalitarian. Your stance may not be as universal as you assume, which would indicate that it is a learned/cultural value rather than an actual biological drive in humans. Doesn't make it any less real from your point of view, but it could mean that moving to a different subculture could be part of the solution for you.


It's just evolution at work, survival of the fittest, the best strongest genes get passed on. I don't think there is any society in the world where introverted poor loner are seen as attractive, how isn't it biology? Think about it, we're still animals. I'm not too interested in living in some primitive African matriarchal tribe, I somehow doubt things would be better. A lot of places in the world and thru out a lot of history marriages were arranged and it was down for the benefit of the families so security has been a big part. Even at it's most primitive, attraction favors those with more physical stature because that is an example of security. Perhaps if I aimed for the third world I would be more attractive since then I'm not poor and quite cosmopolitan by those standards :roll: , what do you mean different subculture?



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,856
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

16 Nov 2015, 2:56 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Edenthiel wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
It's biology, women are attracted to security and social capital whereas men are more physical and do not care much about the security/social capital she might bring. If anything, I'd say a lot of guys are intimidated by a woman with a lot of security and social capital. From a logical standpoint, it makes perfect sense. Why would the chooser choose someone that doesn't improve their standing? Nobody wants somebody that they feel will drag them down, it doesn't matter how witty or nice or how much of a good person you are, all that matter is what you bring to the table and for us on the spectrum there isn't much. For a lot of women, there is a mantra of never "dating down" and we're on the bottom so that's that.

I'm pretty sure no actual biological cause has been identified, only posited by researchers living in a culture where such role-based values and assumptions are endemic due to hegemony. You may wish to investigate societies that were traditionally matriarchal or egalitarian. Your stance may not be as universal as you assume, which would indicate that it is a learned/cultural value rather than an actual biological drive in humans. Doesn't make it any less real from your point of view, but it could mean that moving to a different subculture could be part of the solution for you.


It's just evolution at work, survival of the fittest, the best strongest genes get passed on. I don't think there is any society in the world where introverted poor loner are seen as attractive, how isn't it biology? Think about it, we're still animals. I'm not too interested in living in some primitive African matriarchal tribe, I somehow doubt things would be better. A lot of places in the world and thru out a lot of history marriages were arranged and it was down for the benefit of the families so security has been a big part. Even at it's most primitive, attraction favors those with more physical stature because that is an example of security. Perhaps if I aimed for the third world I would be more attractive since then I'm not poor and quite cosmopolitan by those standards :roll: , what do you mean different subculture?


Social Darwinism is obnoxious, how much money someone makes has very little to do with survival of the fittest. Its not just people working in retail who get paid below the living wage, plenty of people in labor jobs aren't making wages to cove basic costs of living on their own either. Survival of the fittest applies to nature not human constructs and financial hierarchy. How many filthy rich CEOs in the 1% do you think would survive if you stick them in the wilderness with no resources?


_________________
We won't go back.


YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

16 Nov 2015, 3:26 pm

My husband was on welfare and worked part-time "under the table" when I met him. He lived with his parents. He didn't have a driver's license, much less a car. He's never gone to college.
You know what mattered to me? That he was kind. He asked me if I was cold. He asked me if I was hungry. He asked me if I was tired. He treated (and still treats) me with respect and consideration. Last week I bought him a hat I knew he wanted, because I knew he wouldn't spend the money on himself. This week he surprised me by putting up the Christmas tree while I was out, because he knows that's a task I hate. That's what love is.
Don't listen to what "media" tells you about how love and life work. Don't get wrapped up in ideas about "alpha males" and Darwinism and such crap. Be a nice guy. A nice girl will appreciate it.



Edenthiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,820
Location: S.F Bay Area

16 Nov 2015, 4:09 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
My husband was on welfare and worked part-time "under the table" when I met him. He lived with his parents. He didn't have a driver's license, much less a car. He's never gone to college.
You know what mattered to me? That he was kind. He asked me if I was cold. He asked me if I was hungry. He asked me if I was tired. He treated (and still treats) me with respect and consideration. Last week I bought him a hat I knew he wanted, because I knew he wouldn't spend the money on himself. This week he surprised me by putting up the Christmas tree while I was out, because he knows that's a task I hate. That's what love is.
Don't listen to what "media" tells you about how love and life work. Don't get wrapped up in ideas about "alpha males" and Darwinism and such crap. Be a nice guy. A nice girl will appreciate it.

This, so many times over. As my grandmother used to say, "you'll get who you deserve"...it took decades until I understood what she meant. And, it's true for both genders.


_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan


BTDT
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,384

16 Nov 2015, 4:21 pm

You mean like the pretty girl that would only date rich guys and concluded that anyone worth dating was a jerk or worse. And she went to a pretty good high school in a New England suburb, which means that many of her classmates who she wouldn't date did quite well financially after a few years--but not before getting degrees from the top schools in the country.



MDD123
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

16 Nov 2015, 5:55 pm

Men are expected to not be vulnerable or show anything outside of the range of masculine feelings. That's the status quo I see. Then there's an NT-esque layer of communication one is expected to perform.

Women have to look attractive and expect that any real man will want to sow some wild oats from time to time. Once again, those NT skills seem to dictate just how demanding a pretty person can get away with being.

Some people are unlucky enough to live in those bounds and wish they didn't. Some people just get out there and try to see what else life has to offer and develop things like talent and actual character and maybe a better reason for living.


_________________
I'm a math evangelist, I believe in theorems and ignore the proofs.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

16 Nov 2015, 6:41 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Edenthiel wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
It's biology, women are attracted to security and social capital whereas men are more physical and do not care much about the security/social capital she might bring. If anything, I'd say a lot of guys are intimidated by a woman with a lot of security and social capital. From a logical standpoint, it makes perfect sense. Why would the chooser choose someone that doesn't improve their standing? Nobody wants somebody that they feel will drag them down, it doesn't matter how witty or nice or how much of a good person you are, all that matter is what you bring to the table and for us on the spectrum there isn't much. For a lot of women, there is a mantra of never "dating down" and we're on the bottom so that's that.

I'm pretty sure no actual biological cause has been identified, only posited by researchers living in a culture where such role-based values and assumptions are endemic due to hegemony. You may wish to investigate societies that were traditionally matriarchal or egalitarian. Your stance may not be as universal as you assume, which would indicate that it is a learned/cultural value rather than an actual biological drive in humans. Doesn't make it any less real from your point of view, but it could mean that moving to a different subculture could be part of the solution for you.


It's just evolution at work, survival of the fittest, the best strongest genes get passed on. I don't think there is any society in the world where introverted poor loner are seen as attractive, how isn't it biology? Think about it, we're still animals. I'm not too interested in living in some primitive African matriarchal tribe, I somehow doubt things would be better. A lot of places in the world and thru out a lot of history marriages were arranged and it was down for the benefit of the families so security has been a big part. Even at it's most primitive, attraction favors those with more physical stature because that is an example of security. Perhaps if I aimed for the third world I would be more attractive since then I'm not poor and quite cosmopolitan by those standards :roll: , what do you mean different subculture?


Social Darwinism is obnoxious, how much money someone makes has very little to do with survival of the fittest. Its not just people working in retail who get paid below the living wage, plenty of people in labor jobs aren't making wages to cove basic costs of living on their own either. Survival of the fittest applies to nature not human constructs and financial hierarchy. How many filthy rich CEOs in the 1% do you think would survive if you stick them in the wilderness with no resources?


Human constructs and financial hierarchy are as part of nature as ant colony or pack of wolves are, how are we separate from animals? Ours may be more complex but unless you believe we were divinely creative, it's the same. Our environment has changed but so have what we find attractive, the modern man is attractive to the modern woman so in what ways can a modern man provide security? Instead of big and strong, lots of money and a large social network implies health and security. Is Darwinism really that different than social Darwinism? I don't think so, nature is brutal and ugly and I certainly think we should aspire to be more than our animal parts but if you want a general answer as to why things are the way they are then it's a good explanation. I would say money has almost everything to do with survival in our modern society.

As for dropping the filthy rich CEO into the wilderness, they'd probably do better than you think because when your filthy rich you have a lot more time to do outdoors fun stuff as opposed to a poor urban working sap.

I don't think you ladies need to defend yourselves, you're all saints but lets be real there is more to being attractive as a man than how he looks and treats other people. Being nice is not enough, being nice to women who don't like you will get you the creeper label. Saying nothing will get you it too so you can't win. Having a job, car, your own house/apartment, friends, etc are important to a lot of women maybe not all but enough to say I am not confident approaching any women given those are prerequisites for most. As a guy on the spectrum, it's just an additional handicap and one not easily remedied. If I ever meet anybody it's just going to be pure dumb luck, I don't expect it will ever all just *click* for me. Somebody said find someone like yourself? So someone on the spectrum? Yeah, alright sure good luck with that. I can't chase therefor in all likelihood my bloodline dies out. I can't get rejected hundreds of times on the off chance that somebody even gives me a chance, I'd probably kill myself. I don't know why its so painful for me and rolls off like water for others, I guess that's the anxiety disorder I dunno.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

16 Nov 2015, 7:09 pm

[MODERATOR]

Just a reminder, this is the Haven, so, please keep the bickering outside.

As for "generalizations," in the Haven, there's a greater tolerance as, sometimes, people just need to vent. Sly suffers from anxiety and depression, so please keep in mind that his ability to communicate may be hindered.

Thank you.

[/MODERATOR]


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Edenthiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,820
Location: S.F Bay Area

16 Nov 2015, 10:17 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Edenthiel wrote:
...but it could mean that moving to a different subculture could be part of the solution

[...]...what do you mean different subculture?


Well, sly279 and you both seem to have a certain view of our culture and how men and women are taught to value each other. I was brought up to buy into that worldview, too. But a few experiences in the last 8-9 years convinced me that my values and worldview actually resonated with the groups & subcultures I'd been taught were evil, misguided, mistaken, (insert a bunch of offensive terms about alternate subcultures here). Then I got to know them and learned that a big part of the reason alternative subcultures are called that is because they don't buy into what our mainstream culture convinces everyone is "best". Thing is, though, they seem so much happier with life and themselves than people I'd been brought up to idolize and try to emulate...


_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

17 Nov 2015, 12:59 am

I like that brain/beauty avatar.