You are all extremely understanding people. most everything on this forum is sane and accurate. i hate to have an us and them attitude and say some stereotype of NT's or even consider the existence of NT's (to prevent me being prejudiced against them). Perhaps my differences are with a very few people....but i did not send more than one request, my photo is not offensive, i did not write anything off the wall in my "about me" i think when i allow myself to feel guilty i am putting wasted effort out to the dismissive person that reported me for sending a friend request. everyone is right about facebook, it is really filled with a lot of people that play games with others to-
1) prolong conflict and uncertainty
2) attack anyone that does not agree with them
i have found it easier to write (my grammar is bad in this post i am very aware of it, but i am also very upset- sorry for the excuses!) better for those within my field, with an editor that i pass things through. the very few mean people that i have dealt with harass a lot less if they have to write to a magazine editor to complain.
there is an NT person who i was interviewing for an article and i sent him questions, he took the questions and crafted them into a pseudoscientific rant, then threatened me with intel property lawsuit if I wrote about it- he/she has harassed me for over a year. the professional journalists i know told me he is bluffing. just write it he can do nothing, especially since the words will be different.
so i do not blog independently anymore. recently i found out the person that threatened the lawsuit tried to steal my identity and spread some things that are provably untrue all over the net... so i am trying to get that taken down...
so, to be fair maybe the person saw some of the things this NT posted? Either way, people use fb a certain way yet punish others for doing the same thing. i could be biased about "how dare you not accept the request." It could have been something posted by someone that scared the fb invitee..
i was doing my normal things, making twitter lists about biological science, and an editor asked me publicly on twitter to write two articles. a very small number of people online got very hostile, including the aforementioned NT, and they went on a dirt digging mission for over a year. when evidence was shown to not support their "story" about me they then started to spread the info just to see others would believe it. sadly i have evidence of this (i wish i was just speculating)
so then i wrote emails ccd to a family member as a witness to tell them to stop and show evidence to the contrary. so from one email sent by my hubby they told my husband he was stalking them! to add insult to injury i made screenshots saved the network traffic info, and used bbflashback to respond to the person because they accused me of writing my husband's emails. i showed them this evidence to stop the misunderstanding and to correct the error. this made them madder. it is common advice to ignore harassers but when my only job options are online i have to protect myself. i sleep about 2 hrs a night...very tired of this. they just spread the info more and more. a normal person would have just stopped telling people inaccurate info after they saw proof that they were not accurate with identifying the person they are cybersanctioning. the more evidence for inaccuracy i revealed to them caused my harassers to become more angry and to continue to circulate the negative untrue info
thank you to everyone that responded, i was kind of scared to look at the responses here too, fortunately i was not attacked here. i am not against disagreement (disagreements are not attacks IMO), just harassment. thanks again