Congress snuck gun control into the funding bill.

Page 1 of 3 [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 3:39 am

The funding bill should always be passed on its own. Now we aspies maybe be stripped of our rights to own guns and defend ourselves. They are always hating ind aspies and disabled people. :cry:



Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

23 Mar 2018, 3:46 am

i don't think they have aspies in mind when making legislation.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 4:00 am

Kiprobalhato wrote:
i don't think they have aspies in mind when making legislation.


Aspies are autistic aka autism. They think autistics are mentally defective and shouldn’t own guns. As far as they see aspergers and autism is thst think all mass shooters had. So yes they are thinking of us when making legislation. They see autistics as violent mentality defective people. Do you consider yourself violent and mentally defective? Most disability rights groups don’t cOnsider autism mental illness but politicians and anti gun people do. Even if you don’t want to own guns m you won’t escape the stigmatization from this. Aspies aren’t more violent then NTs. We aren’t mentally defective. I’m so utterly tired of this false stigmatization. If we weren’t diagnosed people would just think we are bit odd that’s it.



ZZZTired
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 476
Location: Awake from a good night's rest

23 Mar 2018, 4:10 am

Sly, I don't like saying this, but sometimes it may be in this world we have to let more privileged people have more rights than us. It may sound terrible at first, but it's actually more truer than what you may believe. Try to have some perspective of someone from foreign countries. I feel the world is patronizing me too and that I'm having less rights as well and that I'm confronted about stuff I have no idea made a correlation on my own self. I do have a tendency to raise an eyebrow like you sometimes. Like for example I know you are just trying to make a complaint like most of these youtubers do on their long speeches on gun rights and how some gun advocates make responses defending their gun rights on the news. I sincerely doubt you are alone in being a gun rights advocate. Now admittedly from appearances it may seem that there are less wrongplanet users who are gun rights advocates. But at this moment Sly, you have to accept that well we all are going to feel uncomfortable around you with a firearm. And to be fair too, I do feel kind of like you that I have trouble getting a word in edgewise and logically. Look, don't let it all get to you, and you should be aware that speaking about gun control laws is an extremely controversial gray area.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 4:24 am

Wtf. No I don’t have to accept that. I’m going report you.



ZZZTired
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 476
Location: Awake from a good night's rest

23 Mar 2018, 4:26 am

You can report me, but I was just reflecting on your post.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 4:29 am

[qoute]Sly, you have to accept that well we all are going to feel uncomfortable around you with a firearm. And to be fair too[/qoute]
There zero connection to aspies and violence. We’re are more often the victims of violence. I’ve never even been in a fight. I don’t even kill bugs or plants unless I absolutely have to.



ZZZTired
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 476
Location: Awake from a good night's rest

23 Mar 2018, 4:31 am

It's a gray area I don't know how to respond to it. I was just using the forum to talk to someone.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

23 Mar 2018, 4:31 am

It's only when there's an autistic mass shooter in headline news that people even think about autistics as dangerous for a few days. Otherwise I'm pretty sure they just view us as nerds, engineers, programmers, video game addicts, and dorky like the cast of big bang theory. The whole "everyone thinks we're shooters," thing is ridiculous. Everyone thinks we're geeks.

I'm curious: What is the gun control language in Congress' funding bill? What exactly does it say?


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 4:37 am

goldfish21 wrote:
It's only when there's an autistic mass shooter in headline news that people even think about autistics as dangerous for a few days. Otherwise I'm pretty sure they just view us as nerds, engineers, programmers, video game addicts, and dorky like the cast of big bang theory. The whole "everyone thinks we're shooters," thing is ridiculous. Everyone thinks we're geeks.

I'm curious: What is the gun control language in Congress' funding bill? What exactly does it say?


It doesn’t pass for politicians and anti gun people. To them we are dangerous mentally ill persons just waiting to go kill bunch of people. They don’t care who we are or what we do. We are a scape goat. They suggest all mass shooters are autistics diagnosed or not.
Only like two were possible asctualy autistic.
They also think now we are all low functioning.
Big Bang theory ? I don’t believe they ever said he’s autistic. People assume he is.im not sold he is. Probably more eccentric ocd.

Good doctor character is aspergers though.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

23 Mar 2018, 4:50 am

So, you don't know what the bill says with regard to gun control? Or if it even says anything about gun control at all?


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 5:59 am

goldfish21 wrote:
So, you don't know what the bill says with regard to gun control? Or if it even says anything about gun control at all?

It’s oepn ended gun control. It means what they want. It says it’s make sure people who wouldn’t have guns don’t have guns. But it’s reallu about making more people not able to own guns. There’s no bill of rights loop hole. All this does it’s. Are it so States will have to put people onto the list who shouldn’t be on the list or lose out on funding. If you get $100 per name and you’re require to have names every week, you start just taking random people to keep the quota. So have a disorder, get added to the list to not buy guns so your state gets the preferred funding. It’s basically The Whole corruption system that lead to the Florida shooter but reversed so now corrupt politicians and state employees will be rewarded for putting innocents on the no list.
You can’t set a quota for unknown number. Very few people who shouldn’t have guns get guns. Talking few thousands out of millions, so how dnthey fill the quota? By changing who they determine who shouldn’t have guns, throwing due process out the window. If yiu get out wrongfully on the list so what



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

23 Mar 2018, 7:07 am

sly279 wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
So, you don't know what the bill says with regard to gun control? Or if it even says anything about gun control at all?

It’s oepn ended gun control. It means what they want. It says it’s make sure people who wouldn’t have guns don’t have guns. But it’s reallu about making more people not able to own guns. There’s no bill of rights loop hole. All this does it’s. Are it so States will have to put people onto the list who shouldn’t be on the list or lose out on funding. If you get $100 per name and you’re require to have names every week, you start just taking random people to keep the quota. So have a disorder, get added to the list to not buy guns so your state gets the preferred funding. It’s basically The Whole corruption system that lead to the Florida shooter but reversed so now corrupt politicians and state employees will be rewarded for putting innocents on the no list.
You can’t set a quota for unknown number. Very few people who shouldn’t have guns get guns. Talking few thousands out of millions, so how dnthey fill the quota? By changing who they determine who shouldn’t have guns, throwing due process out the window. If yiu get out wrongfully on the list so what


This is what it says, word for word? Or this is what you're guessing it says? Somehow I doubt the words above are in the spending bill.
This is what it says?


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 7:42 am

goldfish21 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
So, you don't know what the bill says with regard to gun control? Or if it even says anything about gun control at all?

It’s oepn ended gun control. It means what they want. It says it’s make sure people who wouldn’t have guns don’t have guns. But it’s reallu about making more people not able to own guns. There’s no bill of rights loop hole. All this does it’s. Are it so States will have to put people onto the list who shouldn’t be on the list or lose out on funding. If you get $100 per name and you’re require to have names every week, you start just taking random people to keep the quota. So have a disorder, get added to the list to not buy guns so your state gets the preferred funding. It’s basically The Whole corruption system that lead to the Florida shooter but reversed so now corrupt politicians and state employees will be rewarded for putting innocents on the no list.
You can’t set a quota for unknown number. Very few people who shouldn’t have guns get guns. Talking few thousands out of millions, so how dnthey fill the quota? By changing who they determine who shouldn’t have guns, throwing due process out the window. If yiu get out wrongfully on the list so what


This is what it says, word for word? Or this is what you're guessing it says? Somehow I doubt the words above are in the spending bill.
This is what it says?


It’s called nics fix act, it’s been the buzz in congress last 5 months. They combined it into the funding bill. You read it then the law it’s changing yiu have to dig around more with laws that change stuff.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

23 Mar 2018, 7:52 am

Can you copy and past the actual text that was passed in the bill? Or a link to the actual text?


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

23 Mar 2018, 3:00 pm

Here you go all 2232 pages of it that they passed at midnight without reading it much.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics ... index.html

Oh and trump signed it today so now it’s law and we just wait til they put our names into nics to meet their quotas.


Quote:
Lee argues that the Department of Veterans Affairs wrongly identifies veterans as "mental defectives," which disqualifies them from gun ownership, when they need help managing their benefits. In a March 18 Townhall essay co-authored by Mark Geist, Lee says about 168,000 veterans have lost their Second Amendment rights as a result of that policy. "Our veterans should not have to worry that their civil rights will be violated if they seek help from the very federal agency that was designed to help them," Lee and Geist write. Lee favors an amendment "requiring a judge to determine that a person is a danger to [himself] or others, or meets similar criteria, before being labeled a 'mental defective.'"