The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
If the only marketable dating qualities you have are on the inside then nobody will ever bother to look. You have to be able to entice someone with looks, stable economic status and/or charisma to get anywhere. If someone's not physically attracted to you, and they want to live a lifestyle that you cannot afford (as in they can pay for holidays overseas etc and you can't pay your own way) why would they consider you as opposed to someone they are physically attracted to and who can pay their own way?
I find it interesting that your first reaction when someone suggests improving your looks is to bring up plastic surgery, as opposed to weight loss, which is something that is actually in your control. It's as if you don't want to put any effort in.
Imo weight loss would help your appearance infinitely more than plastic surgery could, and Id certainly recommend getting down to a more aesthetic weight before even considering plastic surgery, as your face will change for the better with weight loss and you might find plastic surgery wouldn't even be necessary.
You get it. There’s a lot of people here who’ll deny it and say women will look past my lack of qualities if I just had positive attitude. That’s not how the world works. I use to be positive it got me where I am.
Weight loss won’t change my face. Women on dating sites just see my face, plus other fat men fatter then me with good jobs get gfs and wives so body size isn’t as limiting factor as my face and income.
Losing wieght is hard when depressed and soruunded by family who eats whatever they want and buys me snacks. I lost 22-24 pounds after I stalled and gained 15 pounds or so back.