Quote:
Do people hate what they don't understand? Or do they fear it?
Does this imply that people necessarily do not understand something and hate it?
Isn't it possible to fear something that a person understands?
It is generally a stereotype that every person who as a child got molested would be traumatized. You can see the logic, to an extent, but I personally tend not to judge hastily.
Personally, as far as my logic works, I think that it depends on the person, naturally.
Presuming, you've got two situations, 1 of rape and one of consent. Then there's the whole too young to consent spectrum. It is up to you whether you agree with this part or not.
Sure, the rape situation would almost definitely turn out to haunt the child on whom the act was committed.
The consenting one, however, is a different matter. Honestly, at this point there's really not much of a difference between an adult and a child. An adult could be traumatized just as much. It really depends on the person.
So inferring from what you described as molestation, I presume you mean under today's understanding of a the word whence used in the context of a child, too young to consent. Correct?
Or is it that you were you actually raped, against your will, and were basically forced to act upon the wishes of the initiator?
Also, a person is an individual. I honestly cannot really say whether your case is normal because I do not know what exactly occurred. And it will remain as such until these questions will be answered:
1. At what age were all the party members involved?
2. Where and when the event took place.
3. What exactly happened from the beginning to the end.
Take two situations, one of rape and one of consent, and two persons below the age of 13.
P (person) A is raped and is traumatized for life (questionable, but this is just an example).
P B is raped but due to the character of the person the event while didn't traumatize the child, nonetheless had an impact. However, the effect could actually result in good changes, something that needs to be bore in mind. Everything on earth is relative, after all.
P A engages in consensual sexual intercourse with an adult (who the initiator is, matters not), the person later regrets it for some reason - the adult actually desired the child specifically for this reason and therefore only did what can be understood as manipulation and it was later found out.
P B engages in consensual sexual intercourse with an adult, a love bond is actually present, and the two eventually end up marrying each other and living a happy life. The child grows up to be an absolutely average person in terms of mental stability.
Anyway, this post seems to be too long. Pardon, sexology is one of my main subjects of interest so I tend to dwell quite deep into the subject.
I hope this helped in some way.