What is your BMI and weight?

Page 5 of 5 [ 72 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Izaak
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 981
Location: Perth, Western Australia

14 Feb 2008, 1:20 am

197 cm's (6'5")
104 kg's (229lb, 16.3 stones)

=

27.1 bmi

breakdown:
Quite a bit of muscle, a little too much fat. But 9 months ago I had a BMI of 31 and almost no muscle. So it's getting there

P.S... photo's of what?
would this do?

ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

14 Feb 2008, 1:24 am

I'm working on losing weight too. it's very hard. I'm moving soon and i'll be able to get a really, really, cool bicycle, and i'm so excited!

celtic_silver
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 31
Location: Dapto, Australia

14 Feb 2008, 4:03 am

I got 28.0. Or overweight.
With a weight of 96kg.

But I'd disagree on being overweight. I love my contact sports and am always between 90 and 100 kg. I'm around 6'3 in height. (Despite being Australian I'm yet to meet someone who uses cm for height). :wink:

I'm also fairly broad of shoulders and have decent enough muscles. Well decent enough to move around twice my weight if needed.
But yeah, this test fails. Muscles weigh a decent amount more than the ol' adipose tissue. :lol:

_________________
A definition by words is merely a means to deceive oneself. It's meaningless before the truth. What matters is how you perceive things. The slightest shift, then life and death no longer have any meaning.

Izaak
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 981
Location: Perth, Western Australia

14 Feb 2008, 4:05 am

I, Aussie. I use centimeters.

However, I suppose we have not met. But it is more common to use feet and inches, I agree.

celtic_silver
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 31
Location: Dapto, Australia

14 Feb 2008, 4:25 am

Izaak wrote:

I, Aussie. I use centimeters.

However, I suppose we have not met. But it is more common to use feet and inches, I agree.

Yeah.

We're on opposite sides too. Me in the east (NSW), you in the west (WA).
Slightly offtopic I know, but just out of curiousity, though you said it's more common to use feet and inches there, are you guys the same in that you just use feet and inches for height and metric for everything else?

That's how it rolls locally. :wink:

Cor
Butterfly

Joined: 9 Feb 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 16

14 Feb 2008, 4:39 am

celtic_silver wrote:

I'm also fairly broad of shoulders and have decent enough muscles. Well decent enough to move around twice my weight if needed.

But yeah, this test fails. Muscles weigh a decent amount more than the ol' adipose tissue. :lol:

altho I don't weigh the amount of kilo's you do, i can move (carry even) twice my weight aswell... I have always had normal sized muscles, but friend tell me they are stronger then steel... (lifted 2 friends of mine (weighing a total of 155 kilo's combined) and ran 100 meters with them on my shoulder)

Izaak
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 981
Location: Perth, Western Australia

14 Feb 2008, 5:19 am

yeah. If someone asks how tall someone is... it's feet and inches. I am constantly asking what that is in centimeters.

EVERYTHING else is in metric though. From "how long is a piece of string?" to "how far to the other side of nowhere?"

Only reason I know i am 6'5" is because I have: http://www.onlineconversion.com/interna ... riends.htm

Kirov
Blue Jay

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 81
Location: Rzhev

14 Feb 2008, 6:08 am

BMI 23, 155 lb - 5' 6.5". And I'm 21. Man, I feel genetically gypped. =_=

Page 5 of 5 [ 72 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Jump to:

What is your BMI and weight? Post Reply New Topic

What is your BMI and weight?