Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

betelgeuse
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 7

06 Dec 2010, 3:10 pm

Is it just me or does anyone else recognize Julian Assanges obsession for thruth and justice as typical Asperger traits......



anneyce
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 64

06 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm

Being some kind of an activist doesn't make everyone an Aspie, thankfully. Would be quite of a shame for Aspies in many cases. :roll:


_________________
"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." (Socrates)


1c2k3p4p5c
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 5 Dec 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 1

06 Dec 2010, 7:03 pm

Whilst being an activist does not automatically equate to Julian Assange being Aspie; being a computer nerd, being particularly capable in physics and maths and being sufficiently socially naive to be accused of sexual harrassment does rather fit the profile.



jmnixon95
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,931
Location: 미국

06 Dec 2010, 11:47 pm

I'd have to meet him in person.
Computer Hacker ≠ criteria for AS



Ackman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Age: 173
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,521
Location: The Creedon Republic

06 Dec 2010, 11:54 pm

He's a criminal.



Mercurial
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 537

07 Dec 2010, 2:40 pm

betelgeuse wrote:
Is it just me or does anyone else recognize Julian Assanges obsession for thruth and justice as typical Asperger traits......


As I've argued on the political blogs I visit, Assange is being mythologized before our very eyes, by both his fans and by those who seek to villify him. He's either black or white. He's either a revolutionary or a sociopath. He's either a hero or a criminal. Common sense will tell you, you won't get a truthful picture of Assange through the eyes of people who what him to be one extreme or another.

Assange's "obsession" with truth and justice is part of the myth his fans and supporters have created around him, so any tough-minded person would naturally be skeptical about how true it really is. As much as you may wish to believe in that myth, you cannot use elements of myth to make an argument that someone has Asperger's. It's just silliness, to be blunt.

For the record, I back what Wikileaks does 100%. As an Aspie, I don't automatically assent to authority. Authority must validate itself, and invalid authority does not have the right to demand either assent or protection. So in that vien, I do not think the governments of the world should get to run their own agendas without accountability to the people they serve. Period. And if it takes something like Wikileaks to break the authoritarian black-out on information to hide morally questionable actions by governemnt and corporations in league with them, then so be it.

But also as an Aspie, I am very, very cautious of people who gather a band of fans and supporters around them to help them deflect criticism from society. That does not point to an Aspie, but a narcissist. Many a narcissist has passed himself as a someone on the "right" side of history. It is not clear what the full story with Assange is yet, but while he may have this quirk here and that quirk there that an Aspie could relate to, you gotta judge the machine by the product it produces. And the Assange machine sure seems to produce a lot of evidence that points to narcissism far more than Asperger's.

Let me make one thing clear: just because you sympathize with someone doesn't mean he/she is one of you. People on the autism spectrum are very guillable that way. Contrary to the whole "no empathy/cant connect to others" meme about us on the spectrum, we very often feel empathy and sympathy to a deeper extreme than NTs, and that can impede our judgement as we lose our objectivity very quickly that way. Don't kid yourself. Assange isn't the smartest person on the planet, but frankly, he's a hell of lot smarter than most of you here. And he seems very happy to play on the sympathy and/or loathing of people who he knows aren't as smart as him and who he knows he can hoodwink without any effort. When you are as smart and clever as him, the world is just a basket full of suckers ready to be played.

In my very blunt opinion, he has spent his entire life playing people and he's very, very good at it. He fits the classic trickster archetype--someone who lives on the fringe of society, often at odds with society, usually taunting and outwitting society but eventually does have to face the music he helped create. If he follows the whole trickster archetype to its typical end, he'll likely end up paying excessively for what society judges as his "crime," like the mythical trickser Prometheus. But we'll have to wait and see on that. Nonetheless, regardless of whatever judgment society makes of him, it will have to take either some very smart, tough-minded people who are immune to his tricks or the unwavering light of truth and justice to make Assange be accountable for Assange. And only then, I think, will we get to see the "real" Assange, and maybe then, we're find out if he's really on the spectrum or not. But until then, this is his path and I'm happy to leave him to it. He doesn't need a troop of cheerleaders or a chorus of detractors for that, and more improtantly, he doesn't need any outcast group like us Aspies adopting him out of sympathy.



Mootoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,942
Location: over the rainbow

07 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm

Mercurial, great post. I agree that no one should adopt Assange emotionally - although he certainly shouldn't be demonized like he is in the media right now (rape? Really? They're not being very original, are they?) or worse, assassinated as some extremist politicians so vocally claim (Goddamn really?! I'm sure he's a total religious nut).

What people should really concentrate on is what Wikileaks represents. The concept of transparency in government, and not building a personality cult for any single individual (ironically, Wikipedia, which is sometimes confused with Wikileaks simply because of the name, this year just decided to go on a full-blown personality cult of its 'founder', in its fundraiser. I'm wondering whether people would think that Jimmy got arrested now instead... what bad timing).