Vigilans wrote:
The most credit I'll give astrology is that at one point, it was really the best tool of understanding the cosmos available, and most of the early astronomers were astrologers by trade- but that was a long time ago, before the Enlightenment, and before the invention of the telescope,
That's not quite true, is it?
For a long while after Galileo looked upwards, saw things no other human had seen before, and made odd little drawings in his notebooks, astrology and astronomy were still very much interlinked/interchangeable. Even Newton, as key a figure in the Enlightenment as you can get, studied astrology (though I don't think he thought much of it). And, for most of written history, astrology was (apart from the simplistic explanations provided by religious tracts) the
only tool for understanding the cosmos.