cyberdad wrote:
It's quite sad that people of biracial background who appear "white" are more accepted into mainstream society than a sibling who is darker skinned. A bit like a high functioning Aspie who is better treated than his/her low functioning sibling with ASD. Ethnicity is yet another socially determined hierarchical spectrum.
As long as governments find ethneticity (sp?) important enough to have tick-boxes on forms, and as long as people feel the need to point out that they are X% black and Y% white instead of talking about how their Somali and Irish culture in their homes have influenced them.
Is 'race' about the genetic traits or the social environment/culture? If it is about genetics, then why are different caucasian nationalities in the ancestry considered multiracial? Or different asian nationalities in the ancestry considered multiracial? But black is always black, not multiracial?
I look Indian (the country), but my heritage (or the culture I grew up in) is not. Does that make me 'biracial'?
Besides, I thought all humans were the same race or species.