Phemto wrote:
Dear_one wrote:
Gender is only complex for a minority of people.
That's true. It is a minority. Should society make minor adaptations that help a minority of people? Like... for instance, us autistic people?
I'd like some accommodations. Only fair that I provide them as well, especially since it's just two damned words to let people know how I see myself. If sharing that much about you is "denying you humanity," than WTF are you doing on internet forums expressing any feelings at all?
The offended feeling comes in when almost everyone else using personal pronouns that way also insists that I don't understand gender, and that they are not confused. If society is going to accept anyone's private definition, I should be able to access the women's change room and take a ton of attitude with me.
Dave Chapelle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_EXb8_8xlM and I have had pretty similar histories of a lifetime of tolerance, followed by being attacked. I display a fuller beard than any woman, so I don't like being asked my gender, and have to doubt the sanity of anyone who is confused.
I have been curious about the recent boom in "trans" at the expense of "bisexual" and wonder how much is driven by surgeons out to make a buck. In a parallel debate, someone brought up soup of endocrine disruptors that children are raised on now, and that seems quite valid, but hard to measure. I still think the core of the problem has been the lack of positive messages about straight men, and the steady barrage of negative stereotypes. Anorexia Nervosa is a serious, fatal disorder caused simply by advertising, which convinces some women that they are not thin enough, even as they starve to death. For most people, gender is much more malleable than the desire to eat, so that does not mean they are not victims of manipulation rather than expressions of cellular reality.
If we abandon any objective definition of gender, it will be much harder to have a rational debate about it.