Their rigid confidence and authoritative mandate to punish autistic people without explanation or warning because they magically know our intentions and reasoning, so it's their job to inflict pain. I think a lot of our social isolation is a direct result of this. They don't need to listen to us because we are automatically assumed wrong in any disagreement. They have this strong need to tell us what we think and teach us how what they told us we think is wrong. Even if they are right, if we don't understand it because that's not how we see it and a healthy mutual conversation did not take place, what we learn is that others are overwhelming and unpredictable, while we're unacceptable or allowed to exist because we can't even share our perspective.
I predict that at least 98% of us have had a high frequency of interactions in which an NT gets upset at us out of nowhere, does something to hurt our feelings, and then tells us it's because of an intention they made up for our behaviors, while those behaviors were ironically and literally copied from another NT when we saw it work out for them. With this high unpredictability and inability to have our intentions validated, we learn that people are dangerous and we are not allowed to exist outside. Especially since other NTs can do the same behavior and get rewarded, but when we do it we get punished. Best stay home and chat with other auties online doing the same thing. 
ToughDiamond wrote:
Well, apparently it's a useful means of weighing up strangers:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... study-says
So it might not be as trivial and vacuous as it looks, if you can divine stuff about people from it. Maybe Aspies aren't so good at that.
But it seems that people enjoy more depth and that it has an untapped potential to improve social bonding and cohesion:
https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases ... -strangers
They think the reason it's untapped is miscalibrated expectations - nobody dares to wade in too deep with a stranger in case the stranger thinks them weird. But I think it might be more to do with the danger of getting too close before we know what they're really like.
Me, I went through a phase when I railed against small talk and I even wrote the following into a song:
Hello again, it's nice today
And you hope the clouds will stay away
And that's as deep as you want to go
Why is it always so?
But I was rather lonely and naive at the time, having just been torn away from a bunch of very friendly, deep people and plunged into a life that was making me feel alienated and unfulfilled. Later on I mellowed a bit.
I read something similar to that in a Field Guide to Earthlings (book explaining NTs to us)! The author states that the point of small talk is to make non-committal statements to identify each other and something else I can't remember right now. But the whole thing is rooted in plausible deniability. They can say something without being held accountable for it. Oddly enough, they all know that's what they're doing, so it seems like they just like to have chaotic noise introduced into their conversations. Maybe they like the rush?
_________________
"Am I wrong?" - Walter Sobchak