kraftiekortie wrote:
If you were a cis-woman.....I believe you would be close to my type....
I do have an "aesthetic sense," I do believe.
I believe in transcending what is "plainly real."
My problem, really, is that I don't like putting in the hard work to really decorate my home in an "aesthetically pleasing" way. I'm content with having a mattress on the floor, maybe a dining room table, a few chairs, a couch. Simple things.
If I were living in Edwardian times, I would really be an outlier....
And women who are strongly into the "aesthetics of the home" would be turned off to me----because I would talk about "why make such a fuss?" when "making a fuss" is of the utmost importance to her.
I really like the Baroque....but I get a headache from it from going broke from it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23259/2325942d5f956e23d0b663fc36737595f5c951a3" alt="Razz :P"
I think my step-sister would be your type, unfortunately she's taken. She's like 'girl me' or '40 something me'. I haven't seen her in years but when I do see her we get into conversations on literature, mostly.
And I think deep platonic friendships are more worth valuing than society does at present. I feel like we 'connect' in that way.
A while ago you said I don't look down on people due to my MA. In a way that's true. I see people like you - learned autodidacts - as worthy of respect. You're amazing in how much you know tbh.
I have little time though for anti-intellectual types esp when it's not due to disability but simple laziness/cool status. I've been around it too much and it's even held back my education: all of them NTs who thought it fun to ask questions they already knew the answers to just so that they didn't 'have' to learn anything new
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0397c/0397c7fb86ea96d31908e70302a52093cb6cd1b7" alt="Sad :("
. Learning new stuff in my favourite subjects is
fun to me, rehearing stuff I knew when I was 7 isn't.
The furniture thing is just about £££/$$$. The actual effort involved is having the taste/doing the research to find authentic pieces. The rest is just putting the dollar/pound down at the auction house or antique shop.
I think a librarian would be your type but idk if that's (staff dating) frowned upon within libraries? (Also I can't remember if you're divorced or married, if you're married ignore this advice lol)
What upsets my aesthetics is: my mum (and I, but I didn't choose it) used to live in an IKEA stacked house. It was exactly the same as her friends' houses except in shape. She did it because '00s home decor shows recommended it - that way when you sell the house, they can imagine their own stamp on the house. Not even allowed photos on the wall and this was before facebook so all our photos were in albums
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0397c/0397c7fb86ea96d31908e70302a52093cb6cd1b7" alt="Sad :("
I see it as a 'show home' way to live rather than a 'home' way to live. Far too generic outside of a show home.
She has her 'forever home' now and she stacks it with rural prints, Rob Ryan etc. I think a
bit cottage core? And a bit her own thing. Her kitchen looks like an ice cream parlour, she even has pottery ice-creams which she made herself.
_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him