Quote says thousand failures, repetition and try again.
What it does not say is how to know what went wrong in the first place, what did right after an attempt, and if said failure may or may not be a dead end or a path to pursue, or if failing may mean actual danger and not a perceived one?
After all, attempting the same things and expecting different results is insanity.
Quote says to ignore nay sayers.
What it does not say is how not to be reactive, how to filther said nay sayers, how to regulate one's emotions, how to reprise, how to rise your level of consciousness.
Quote says to be positive.
What it does not say is how to not be in denial, how to not make it feel inauthentic and fake, how to not be positively toxic, how to not ignore reality.
Quote says it's the action and impact, not the intent.
What it does not say it's never about being a good person but it's about reliable and how to do so, that it's not about caring and it's just basically executive function, balance and management -- anything beyond what deems a person's "character" or "morality".
So many unspoken sh*t, that no wonder why I kept questioning every advice, every method, every other thing.
Figure it out?? Then I'll look for a change. But what if that change is to leave?
Then gets judged as a coward or some fleeing coping mechanism, not as removal from unhealthy environment and people, not as a way to be away from ineffective people, not as a form of second opinion.
And those who cannot even leave? Suck it up and cope it? Rot to decay? Doesn't matter in the end. I won't be surprised if a person ends up destroying themselves in the process of NOT being able to change and have an actual choice.
Then told me not to overthink? Fine.
If people don't want the "slow" overthinker, they'll get the impulsive "hasty" doer.