riverso wrote:
Aother film banned from being seen in the UK is Keith Allen's documentary "Unlawful Killing" about the death of Princess Diana, which is a bit stupid because all that does is add to the conspiracy.
It's also speculative, biased nonsense and it seems it wasn't banned: Allen decided to not release it in the UK:
Quote:
Allen is a very clever man: pre-release, the sometime comedian has made claims that in order to screen in the UK, lawyers have demanded that a princely total of 87 cuts be made, a demand that the filmmaker condemned out of hand, and simply decided not to screen it in the UK.
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/cannes-2011-review-keith-allen-unlawful-killing.php
The requested changes relate to alleged libelous content so what's more likely is that no UK distributor would touch it with a barge-pole because of the legal difficulties which would result from broadcasting an alleged libel: if that aspect was tested and found true, the broadcaster would be held to be as guilty as the film's maker.
So really, a "ban" is not even necessary for a film which constitutes a legal minefield.
The problem with any conspiracy theory is that once the thing starts running there is no stopping it -
anything can and is taken on board as self-perpetuating evidence.
The moon landing, 9/11, Diana: they all essentially exist in a self-fueling, evidence-free vacuum.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.