Kajjie wrote:
I went to give blood today, so I had planned to do that, and due to some confusion, waiting and preparing for it took up quite a bit of my day. When I got there, I filled out the form, and had to tick yes to a couple of questions, including "Have you ever had a serious illness or seen a doctor about your heart?" Why on Earth they chose to merge those two questions into one I don't know. I have never had a serious illness (I interpreted this to mean one that required hospital care, although the form didn't define things like this), but I did go to see my GP about palpitations a while ago, as I used to suffer from anxiety, and they were freaking me out. I've just started considering myself recovered from anxiety problems. I then had to sit down and wait for a while before I spoke to a nurse to go through the form. I explained about the palpitations appointment, and that the GP found that there is nothing wrong with my heart: it's just caused by stress. She asked when this appointment was. I am very bad at knowing/guessing when things happened; my sense of time is rubbish, so that was awkward. She then asked when the last time I had palpitations was. I explained I'd had palpitations two days ago, nothing really bad, just a bit weird and uncomfortable. I was then told this prevents me from giving blood. To give blood, I will apparently have to be free of palpitations for six months. I'm not sure that'll ever happen.
I feel a bit annoyed, because loads of people probably have palpitations like the ones I have now (infrequent and mild), and the blood service just never know about it because those people haven't gone to a doctor about it. The other thing is, my blood is probably some of the safest out there. I'm a virgin, I don't travel abroad, I'm not on medication and I don't drink caffiene or alcohol. And others just lie and give blood, risking others. My friend feels a bit ill, maybe is getting a cold, but said that she didn't because she wanted to give blood. And though it's not serious, it means whoever recieves that blood will get a cold virus in them when they're already weak. I've known others use the blood service for a HIV test. And others just lie about their own health, so they don't have the problem I have - they overreact to any slight problem to protect you. I feel like my honesty has got me in trouble again.
The rules for this don't seem to make any sense. It's okay to give blood if you take medication, usually. I can't imagine that it's that good for the person recieving the blood to recieve a dose of someone else's medication. You can't give blood if you've ever had homosexual sex, not just 'with a new partner in the last 6 months' which would ensure the HIV test was valid. They never asked me if I suffer from dizzy spells or have ever fainted, although these would probably mean someone shouldn't give blood because they'd faint from the blood loss.
Ugh. Not enough logic.
I had atrial tachycardia last year. The folks at the Red Cross said I had to wait six months with no recurrence of any heart condition before I could donate again. Part of the policy is to protect the donor. Part is to protect the Red Cross from possible law suits.
The Red Cross will also disqualify anyone who has spent extensive time in Africa or in European countries where they have had Mad Cow disease. And they definitely disqualify anyone with aids, and anyone who has or has lived with anyone who has had hepatitis.
ruveyn