jimservo wrote:
Int'l: United Kingdom, Malaysia, South Korea, Australia, United States, Brazil, Cape Verde,
US: Alaska, California, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah
Canada: Ontario
(Edit: Austria: Tyrol)
Strictly on what caught my eye looking through a flag book here. I am not big on tricolours (probably because of the lack of them here in the states).
I don't like the USA state flags that are just a state seal on a dark blue background (ie, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New York, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Michigan, etc). In fact, Wisconsin had to add the state's name in big letters to it in the 1970s to make its flag more different from the others at longer range.
Of the other states, for pure design I like Maryland, California, Ohio, Illinois, Texas, Alaska (the one exception to my 'dark blue sheet' dislike), Arizona and Colorado.
For sheer
*BRILLIANCE* in its design concept (and that it is a highly attractive design in its own right), I'll have to give a big honorable mention to Georgia's new state flag, perhaps even putting it at the very top of my 'like' list. If you need for me to explain why, then you would not understand.
For national flags, I'll have to give my nod to the USA's. It is a well over 200 year old design that was intended from the beginning to be adaptable to changes in the nation's makeup and is a highly attractive and balanced layout in its own right. It is also tolerant of weather wear, the parts of the physical sheets that wear off first in the wind are the ends of the stripes and a sizable amount can be gone before it will look worn.
I also like how the USA, Mexico and Canada flags look side-by-side.
Of the European flags, I like the British Union Jack the most.
For the rest of the World, I like Panama, Brasil, Israel, South Africa, Japan and Kenya.
Mike