03 Feb 2012, 12:31 am
Fnord wrote:
a. There is no valid empirical evidence to support any claim of accuracy in astrological predictions.
b. Absence of evidence, while not evidence of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.
: : It is reasonable to doubt the validity of any claim of accuracy in astrological predictions.
Conversely, it is unreasonable to believe in the validity of any claim of accuracy in astrological predictions.
b. Absence of evidence, while not evidence of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.
: : It is reasonable to doubt the validity of any claim of accuracy in astrological predictions.
Conversely, it is unreasonable to believe in the validity of any claim of accuracy in astrological predictions.
(I'm just teasing you, by the way.)
