14 Mar 2007, 6:54 pm
14 Mar 2007, 9:24 pm
deep-techno wrote:
Girls take up your time and your money
So Girls = Time x Money
So Girls = Time x Money
No, that should be Girls = Time + Money
=> Girls = Time + √Evil
=> Girls² = Time² + Evil
=> Evil = Girls² - Time²
=> Evil = (Girls - Time)(Girls + Time)
=> Evil = (Girls with Time) x (Girls without Time)
.
.
.
.
.
Sorry, what was the question?
edit: - no one noticed my error above
=> Girls = Time + √Evil
=> Girls² = (Time + √Evil)²
=> Girls = √(Time² + 2Time x √Evil + Evil)
which just proves that girls are complex creatures.
Last edited by BazzaMcKenzie on 15 Mar 2007, 1:34 am, edited 5 times in total.
Anubis
Veteran
Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 136
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,911
Location: Mount Herculaneum/England
14 Mar 2007, 9:46 pm
RedMage wrote:
YAY! I'm evil! Oh wait, I already am evil! 
What? Don't look at me, I had nothing to do with it!! *hides evil plans*
<_<
14 Mar 2007, 11:25 pm
14 Mar 2007, 11:32 pm
calandale wrote:
It is not the case that Girls = Time + Money
It is not an equivalence relation. I have time and money, but no girls.
It is not an equivalence relation. I have time and money, but no girls.
maybe you need more money
Since gilrs came as discreet integers (you can't get a fraction of a girl - but I suppose you could share
), and money doesn't, there must be some threshold level of money required before you get a single girl. There would be some sort of "step" relationship.
GoatOnFire
Veteran
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
14 Mar 2007, 11:59 pm
BazzaMcKenzie wrote:
calandale wrote:
It is not the case that Girls = Time + Money
It is not an equivalence relation. I have time and money, but no girls.
It is not an equivalence relation. I have time and money, but no girls.
maybe you need more money
Since gilrs came as discreet integers (you can't get a fraction of a girl - but I suppose you could share
), and money doesn't, there must be some threshold level of money required before you get a single girl. There would be some sort of "step" relationship.Power and fame don't hurt either.
15 Mar 2007, 12:42 am
15 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
15 Mar 2007, 11:27 am
Beenthere wrote:
Proof that men are 3 times more evil:
First we state that men need time, money, girl and sex.
Men = Time x Money x Girl x Sex
We all know “time is money.”
Time = Money
Therefore:
Men = Money x Money x Girl x Sex
And we all know to many men:
Girl = Sex
As for men’s proof showing “girls are evil” So
Girl = Evil then,
Evil = Sex
Men = Money x Money x Evil x Evil
Men = Money^2 x Evil^2
And because “money is the root of all evil.”
Men = (sqrt(Evil))^2 x Evil^2
Men = Evil x Evil^2
Men = Evil^3
Men’s proof:
Girl = Evil
Girl’s proof:
Men = Evil^3
So we are forced to conclude men are worse than girls.
lol
First we state that men need time, money, girl and sex.
Men = Time x Money x Girl x Sex
We all know “time is money.”
Time = Money
Therefore:
Men = Money x Money x Girl x Sex
And we all know to many men:
Girl = Sex
As for men’s proof showing “girls are evil” So
Girl = Evil then,
Evil = Sex
Men = Money x Money x Evil x Evil
Men = Money^2 x Evil^2
And because “money is the root of all evil.”
Men = (sqrt(Evil))^2 x Evil^2
Men = Evil x Evil^2
Men = Evil^3
Men’s proof:
Girl = Evil
Girl’s proof:
Men = Evil^3
So we are forced to conclude men are worse than girls.
lolwell men are batter at maths because your proof shows that men are evil^3 not 3 times as evil
anyhow:
manipulating that proof
if:
men = Evil^3
Girls = Evil
then:
men=Girls^3
15 Mar 2007, 3:49 pm
