ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
John Wilkes Boothe.
Yeah. Never noticed that before.
Back in the day a humorist pointed out that guys who got involved in Watergate tended to go by their first initial plus middle and last name.
E. Howard Hunt. G. Gordon Liddy.
It's interesting because before the assassination of Lincoln, Booth was often billed as
J. Wilkes Booth when he appeared in stage productions.
I wonder if it was Booth's murder of Lincoln that began the trend of referring to assassins by their full name. Plus, it takes away a little stigma if the first and last name alone are commonplace. I don't think Mark David Chapman put much emphasis on his middle name himself. But think of all the possible Mark Chapmans out there who'd forever be linked to someone with their namesake. Adding the David makes it less ambiguous.
James Ray might have been a somewhat common name, so adding the Earl in their helps clarify things, etc.
If you murdered someone famous tomorrow, we'd all know YOUR full name even if you don't even write your middle initial now.
I was thinking about that too. That the media of the time, and later historians (of subsequent generations), will add that middle name so that the perpetrator of the heinous crime has a more distinct name. And so can be distinquished from all of the normal guys of the time and later of the same name. Trouble with that theory is that we dont do that with serial killers so much. Yes...there was John Wayne Gayce, but...we dont bother with the middle names of Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Daumier, or Kevin Bianchi.
So I dunno.
In the case of John Wilkes Boothe: the Boothe family was a major showbiz dynasty of actors in theater (the Kirk Douglas Dynasty, or the Lionel/Drew Barrymore dynasty of his time. And his famous actor dad was also named John. So thats why he needed to be billed with all three names in his own time-to distinquish himself from his charismatic famous kin competitors.
Last edited by naturalplastic on 10 Dec 2020, 4:18 am, edited 1 time in total.