I don't even know him.
But from what I've read, the hate has got nothing to do with his success.
Idealizing someone based on one's idea of success is somewhat superficial.
It's like admiring someone for their looks.
But to find that person do not resonate with your morals, political views, the way that person treats other people (or even, say, animals and the environment), finding out their methods of success to be a let down or even their lifestyle?
Especially, as someone with greater fame and success -- they'd get a higher expectations of these things.
Doesn't matter if they're common human with flaws, doesn't matter it they cannot help it or not, doesn't matter the source of their flaws.
Because they get the spotlight. Meaning they're open to whatever opinion, positive or negative, against them.
And are expected to be 'models' of what humans could do. Unless their PR schtick is sympathetic or something that can get away with such expectation...
FrostBender wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
He's a "free speech absolutist", which MAGAs and other far-right populists love because it means they can cyberbully or otherwise post hateful rhetoric about groups they don't like.
Yeah but you
don’t really have the right to not be offended by someone else’s speech..
Remember this yourself -- since you hate autism so much.
This statement is a sign of lack of empathy.
I could care less if your culture or upbringing is more stoic and declared more superior or whatever.
To declare someone who should or shouldn't, especially even as a 'right' is imposing one's own view onto another.
As much as others don't speak for you...
... Don't speak for them either.