cyberdad wrote:
Phenotypic plasticity masks genetic variation, that's the problem with classical botanical nomenclature when applied to lichen, fungi, algae and bacteria.
But yeah I guess you and Darmok can call yourselves whatever you like.
Yes, I understand that, having studied all those groups and taxonomy being my specialty. And what will we do with all those Fungi Imperfecti? I don't think all of them have been genetically analyzed, but I could be wrong. Also convergent evolution. Also a problem with tropical plants, which all look alike.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca373/ca373cf6105a277f71f4423a82446d04559f9055" alt="Smile :-)"
And even with plants like coca trees. Apparently there are many kinds in the American tropics for which the indigenous peoples have individual names with different actions, but all look the same to Western botanists.
Had I been born a generation earlier, I could have studied botany or biology with the likes of Edward O. Wilson or Richard Evans Schultz. Or a generation later, I could have become this woman...Mycologist Travels World in Search of New Fungi.
https://www.purdue.edu/research/researc ... new-fungi/Had I a different life, I might have done different things. But, I am very happy with the life I have been given and still enjoy seeing what others are up to.
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot