Nades wrote:
Of the women i've actually asked that I'm close too, none of them have heard of the meme, they all pick the man and one thought it was a rhetorical question. None of them viewed it from the perspective of sexual assault, rather they don't want to get eaten by bears.
Who would have guessed that the world doesn't revolve around the Internet and other actual women are entitled to an optinion that differs or, heaven forbid.....a man. The horror.
I thought you weren't gonna respond anymore? That didn't last long.
So you found women who hadn't even heard of the meme, and then asked them about the literal premise of the meme, w/o giving the context and intent of the meme? Sounds like a fair shake to me
Also, it's very nice of you to selectively value the opinions of women when they confirm your opinion, but not when they disagree, for someone who makes a big bluster about all opinions, and the right to disagree.
It's also funny how when you go cherry-pick women that agree with you, you feel extra validated, but when a guy spontaneously agrees with the ladies here, it doesn't mean a thing, and there's a thousand excuses for why it doesn't count.
The issue isn't merely "different opinions". It's a refusal to look at an uncomfortable truth, and a dismissal of a greater problem. Women have been saying "I am worried about being the victim of a sexual assault" for over half a century. Guys didn't care, wouldn't listen, dismissed the message, and blamed the victims. "Look how she was dressed". Guys are still obviously overtly dismissive of the matter. "Well, maybe you're just bad at picking men..." as though that justifies getting assaulted.
"Everyone's opinion is valid!" LOL no the hell it isn't. Everyone gets to HAVE an opinion, but not all opinions are equal, and not everyone's opinion gets to carry the same weight. or would you suggest we allow sexual predators to chime in and make a case in favor of sexual assault - in the name of fairness and being open to all sides and allowing all viewpoints, of course... (hint: that would be absurd to do).
The kum-bay-yah "all opinions are equal for everyone" song and dance may be great for allowing crap ideas to flourish unopposed, and "keeping the peace" is a great excuse to forbid criticism - but criticism isn't inherently a bad thing in and of itself, and sometimes "bickering" is necessary to get dense people to get a clue when they're not listening, or don't want to listen. People always say "you didn't have to shout!" after you already asked them nicely 500 times.