Mountain Goat wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Mountain Goat wrote:
Using the internet to pay for goods.
Why would you want to interfere with my ability to collect toy cars? It's not like I'd deprive you of your trains.
Aww. Why not send a cheque?
It is mainly that I tried it and was told off by my bank as people hacked in and spent a few thousand pounds of money I didn't have and I ended up being blamed for it. It happened despite me using a lengthy password, so I soon realized how easy it was to hack into someones bank account and I have done all I can to avoid making any online payments. I will write checques or order over the phone by card. My view of the internet is that it should be used like a convenient mail order catalogue, where one sees the goods one wants to buy and then one sends a cheque. Some goods I would love to buy but can't as the online companies do not give an address which leads me to another point. If their address is not available, how can one trust that it is a legitimate company? If something goes wrong and the online company does not co-operate, you have no office to go and visit. You don't really have a way to resolve it as you have no way to meet the staff involved in person.
Because sending a physical piece of paper isn't necessary, complicates things, increases the amount of time involved and has the potential to get lost, not to mention it represents a waste of resources.
I'm willing to accept the risks that you describe as ultimately trivial and the anxiety over the potential for those risks as a very small cost for all of the advantages of internet transactions.
It's the difference between knowing that the human body isn't suited to dealing with high speed collisions, and refusing to get in a car, train or other powered form of transportation because '
potentially, I might be at greater risk of injury.' Indeed, but once you've driven to get your groceries and got them all in one trip, walking back and forth between home and the store one bag at a time will never seem like a viable alternative again.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell