auntblabby wrote:
certainly a useful aptitude to have.
...unless I actually
wanted to debate the issue. I don't have anywhere near a 100% preemptive argument strike average, unless the subject is guns, in which case I know the opposition's arguments better than they do since I've been arguing that subject practically my entire adult life.
I've gotten a bit more selective about jumping into the fray, my "wall of logic" style posts can be effective but they are time consuming to research and write and they assume that others in the thread are reasonable. I've learned to dial it back a bit, and more importantly when to just hand another poster the rope to hang themselves with, it's always more effective when you let them destroy their own credibility. I've come up with a system of sorts for deciding whether to rebut a post I disagree with, my new philosophy is to only get involved if the post in question has a veneer of logic to it; a blatantly crazy post does more damage to whatever it ostensibly supports while a post that
seems reasonable but isn't is far more dangerous.
Needless to say all the above is pretty PPR or News forum specific, when it comes to casual conversation not nearly so calculating or unhealthy for the thread, though my warped sense of humor can hit some people the wrong way.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez