15 Apr 2011, 6:13 pm
15 Apr 2011, 6:24 pm
15 Apr 2011, 6:47 pm
The thing I find funniest about it is that they are not posessed of the objectivity or foresight to be able to realise how stupid they are going to feel in a few decades' time, when their idiocy is no longer in fashion and their grandchilden are going to be looking at their photos.
You thought that 70s haircut or 80s wedding dress or 90s shoulder-padded dress were cringe-worthy?
Wait till the grandkids are squealing and pointing: " Mummy! Look! Grandad's trousers were falling down!"
15 Apr 2011, 6:52 pm
You thought that 70s haircut or 80s wedding dress or 90s shoulder-padded dress were cringe-worthy?
Wait till the grandkids are squealing and pointing: " Mummy! Look! Grandad's trousers were falling down!"
I'd hope that would be the case. But I imagine things are only going to get worse. Some of the chavs dressing like this probably already have grandchildren.
15 Apr 2011, 6:55 pm
You mean with all the teenage pregnancies?
I hadn't thought of that.
Well, let's just say the great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren, then.
15 Apr 2011, 7:01 pm
You mean with all the teenage pregnancies?
I hadn't thought of that.
Well, let's just say the great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren, then.
Yeah. Jeremy Kyle seems to be the only person trying to sort them out lol.
Yep, ancestors.
15 Apr 2011, 7:01 pm
15 Apr 2011, 7:06 pm
sartresue
Veteran
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism
15 Apr 2011, 7:14 pm
Nobody else sees the irony of this thread on WrongPlanet?
Ok, fine.
Rant-on Discussion topic
The irony that I see is that this is the only thread that we can all agree on, except you Janissy, as the lone dissenter.
Pretty good for PPR.
Edit: Nuts, they went and moved it. Now I am in unfamiliar territory. (runs back to PPR)
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
15 Apr 2011, 9:15 pm
15 Apr 2011, 9:42 pm
15 Apr 2011, 9:59 pm
Imho theres nothing wrong with the fashion in your local area, my city's fashion done give it a bad name with fake tan, shell suits, Pajamas as daywear. Theres also the scoccer tops of both half of the city red & blue, personal I dislike the blue half as a I perfare to wear an Liverbird on my chest
15 Apr 2011, 10:52 pm
It's not the clothes we have issue with. It's the indecency. The fact that they are sliding down the wearer's rear end and showing their underwear and, in some cases, their buttocks. They're exposing themselves. That's the issue. The issue is not that we're prejudiced against any particular group that chooses to wear XYZ, but rather, the fact that XYZ is not covering ABC. I would have thought that was obvious.
The issue is with people who go out exposing themselves in an inappropriate manner. Whether it's a male wannabe gangster or a female chav whose skirt is riding low and whose thong is peeking out: it's verging on indecent.
15 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
The issue is with people who go out exposing themselves in an inappropriate manner. Whether it's a male wannabe gangster or a female chav whose skirt is riding low and whose thong is peeking out: it's verging on indecent.
Taluke at da birds on lady's day in Aintree!! About Scallies I talked before about in PPR about there dress style & my mother's comments of comparing them to the Hitler Youth.
15 Apr 2011, 11:16 pm
I see I'm not the only Brit who can't sleep...
...Or are you just an early bird? 
I am still scarred from seeing pics of Aintree. If you MUST wear a hat the colour of fluorescent puke and a dress the colour of fluorescent mauve, fine. But at least make sure said dress is a dress, not a top. And please remember to wear some panties. Any colour would be fine. Even if they're fluorescent lime green velvet. We really don't care. Any are better than none.
