Squirrel hunting championship
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
See aforementioned points about lack of empathy for those not identical to yourself.
This is non-sensical.
No it's not. Put your money where your mouth is.
Say what now?
The power plant serving my area of the city was one of the first of it's kind, so any animal displacement took place more than a century ago.
So, that makes it ok huh? Justification to avoid inconvenience.
When the things you're wildly trying to make up about me (to deflect from the fact that squirrels are animals and animals suffer)
are factually-untrue, to the point of being fantastically-imaginative, there need be no "justification" for much.
Here's how it works: You make up something, I say you have it wrong, and then you either rebutt with facts, come up with something new with more of a factual basis, or concede the point. Shoving your fingers in your ears and yelling the same thing over and over is childish.
I save on energy by not getting my panties in a twist at those who state facts.
How does that save on energy, or did it simply sound good in your mind at the time?
I've been seriously-ill before and refused treatments I knew were derived from animal testing, yes.
Well that'll bring the deat rats back and show those researcher's wont it?
I simply live in keeping with my ethics, same as anyone else on Earth.
Refusing to fund certain practices is part of that and is pretty common, your sneering aside.
I'm not obsessed with anything. Not related to this, anyway. Medieval Europe now, is another story. But, we are humans. They are animals. It's not really that hard to grasp.
No, it isn't, although your penchant for repeating it endlessly as if it's remotely relevant to the point, that being suffering, does, actually, border on obsession, or at least pre-occupation with certain premises seen as related to the topic by only you.
Factually untrue,
Not by your statements it's not
Again...huh?
Let's shoot a couple hundred?
That's done every day in war. I don't condone it so don't start running off at the mouth
And you claim you're not upset?
You're veering off of being shrill into lunacy.
There are humane ways of ridding your house of unwanted animals- to pretend that opposition to killing sentient beings for the sake of convenience (especially when it's not necessary for that, even) is tantamount to Disney-esque idealism is somewhat comical.
Yeah, real sentient. Ever have a conversation with a squirrel?
...you have no idea what "sentient" means, do you?
Conversation is impossible between adults and infants, with the communicatively-handicapped, even those of different nationalities.
What difference does that make ethically?
Not an iota.
More sneering. I can practically SEE your twisted little face.
You'll find it best when accompanied with actual points, though.
Attacking me personally, strawmanning, wild fantasies, etc don't qualify.
They were there before you were.
I was here before you were too, on the planet. Does that give me supremacy?
Not at all.
Nor does it give me license to kill you for annoying me,
which is precisely the right you're asserting.
I've had both raccoons and mice problems in the house I currently live in. I managed to evict them by not killing any.
So much for your bald declarations.
Must have been a protracted and nasty time. Glad I didn't live in it!
Not really. It's as simple as buying a few five dollar pest away machines that emit a frequency they don't like.
In both cases, they were gone in a few days.
They're available at any hardware store, in case you're interested.
Wanton killing of squirrels! Alert PETA! Hurry!
Exhibit B.
No need to apologize for something you did not effectively pull off. Try again.
It's squirrels, not people.
Oh, I forgot!
Only PEOPLE suffer when shot.
Literacy fail.
Anyway. I've indulged your bad mood (post-holiday blues, maybe?) long enough.
Since my point about a lack of empathy for non-human animals, and their capacity to suffer, seemed to be what you took issue with, originally, I'll wait for you to get back to it, as opposed to flying into a rage at me for not sharing in your LOL's about squirrel hunting. [/quote]
I see that yu edited your post since the last time I read it to include more insults.
I do not have a "twisted little face", no matter how much you dislike my opinion.
Nor am I having a post holiday mood problem.
Done with responding to your little rant.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,083
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Hehe, my boss would love this contest. A few months back, we had a whole troop of racoons raiding the fruit tree above his office behind the shop, presumably the same bunch that had been into our garbage recently. I was just coming into work and spotted them in the tree, and was like "hey, it's those damn racoons that keep strewing the trash everywhere". Now my boss is like a reformed hillbilly, he traded in his pickup for a Jetta and swapped his jeans for khakis, but at the mention of the words"racoons" and "right there" he was popping the trunk of the Jetta and pulling out a scoped pellet gun with an integral silencer and fitted thumbhole stock... Within minutes we were quietly dropping 'coons out of the tree from the cover of the office, knocking three of them clean out of the tree and into the ravine that runs alongside out store, taking turns with the rifle. Mind you, this was right in the middle of downtown Bainbridge Island, where the residents would be not doubt horrified at the raccoon massacre taking place right under their noses; the Birkenstock crowd is pretty deep out here.
At my own house, I have a non-lethal device I rigged up for driving off deer that also works well on smaller animals, provided my aim is good. It's an old pump-action pellet gun that I bored the pressure cylinder out on, then fitted it with a .40 caliber blowgun barrel along with a low power airgun scope and integral suppressor. I machine aluminum slugs that mate up with plastic blowgun cones designed for sharp darts, and after 15 pumps of the gun they'll punch through drywall at close range (don't ask how I know that). The slugs hit deer hard enough to hurt like hell, but they don't draw blood, and as I aim for the muscle of the haunch there's little danger of permanent injury. I can lower the power by just pumping it up less and use it on smaller creatures as well, most notably one time on a blue heron that was eating the koi my mother had stocked in her pond. That was one unhappy bird, I nailed him right in the keister as he was stalking a fish, and I hit him again in the chest when he retreated to a tree nearby, after which he decided that their were easier meals to be had elsewhere. That thing has been one of my most successful "gee whiz" projects, everyone thought I was just screwing around when I was building it, but it's been endlessly useful living in an area with a multitude of pest animals that occasionally need deterring.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
Have you read all the posts before hers were edited or removed? It looks like some of hers are gone, and almost all of mine that were just a quote of her post with my answers in bold. Most of the "argument" was picking and choosing a phrase, sometimes in context and sometimes out of context and leaving out everything else I had to say on the subject, so as to make it look like I'm out to get the animals.
I'm glad to know that mood disorders and twisted faces are good rational comments to use in debates, however I won't be using anything like that myself.
But, I didn't start this thread to be a debate on hunting. If I had, I would have put it in the PPR forum.
When I was much younger, I used to be very anti-hunting, anti-fur, animal research etc also. I understand the position and I am able to see those points. My views have changed though. I was the same way about abortion. I was very, very pro-life. I've done an (almost) 180 on that one and became very pro-choice, except in cases where the fetus is already viable. The age of viability keeps getting pushed back so rapidly now that it's a hard line to find many times.
My views on those two subjects are pretty moot anyway because I don't hunt and I'm probably getting too old to get pregnant even if my husband hadn't had a vasectomy already.
The entire point of this thread was to poke some lighthearted fun at local people who put on a pretty useless and actually very redneck competition as a way of making money. It's like one step above shooting rats with a bb gun at the dump. Yet it's got lots of people entered, and that is what I find hilarious.
To the other poster who was talking about a humane way to repell deer. This is what you do. Go to barbar shops and hair salons and ask them to save all the cut hair for you for a few days. Buy cheap pantyhose and cut off the legs. Stuff handfulls of air in the toes and tie them. Hang them on fences or posts in the area that you want to keep the deer out of. The scent of many humans in the area will keep them away. It sometimes works on raccoons also, unless they are those "suburban" kind who are very used to people and it's a semi-rural area and they come out frequently. In those cases you have to use garbage cans with the screw on lids, or if you have a big "dumpster" then weight it down with a concrete block.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
I'm going to try and address a couple of matters quickly, then come back and answer the rest. Laundry is calling me lol!
OK, first, I didn't remove any of my posts. I had replied to hers by clicking the quote button and just typing my responses in the quoted area in bold. I imagine that if she deleted her posts that I had answered in a full quote, those would be gone too. My entire posts to her are not there. Only snippets that she is responding to. There are certain points that I made that aren't there now. Then she came back and added more to her responses, including the "twisted little face" comment. There was much more conversation than is showing up now. I didn't edit my posts or remove them. As I said, I imagine that since some of my posts were inside entire quotes, that when she removed hers, it removed mine. I got no notification telling me of any posts of mine being removed by mods, etc, and I certainly didn't do it, so thats the only explination I can come up with.
It's turned into one of those political type ads now, where everything else is removed from a commercial or soundbyte except for one offensive statement. I'm not playing that game.
It's not important enough to me to "win" an online debate about something that isn't a big deal to me, to go back and change or remove my posts.
It's been years and years since I was anti-hunting, fur, and all that. To me, it was all about the fact that bad things were happening to animals and I felt I must do something about it. I was very passionate about my feelings, and really upset over the fact that all that was going on. All the information packets that the places I contacted sent me, with the horrible pictures etc, just kind of got to me. I still ate meat, but felt horrible about it. I suppose what got me to change my mind after a while of being pro animal rights, was a "fish are people too" packet that I got in the mail. It was pictures of fish and was supposed to call up the same feelings in me that bunnies blinded by eye makeup called up.
As for abortion, I got involved with a ministry that a woman at my church worked at, a pro-life ministry. I was pro-life longer than I've been pro-choice, but it was another incidence of overkill that pushed me away from that faction too. It would be dangerous for me to have another baby after my fourth one, for my own health issues. As in life threatening for me. A group within the local pro-life group was trying to pressure my husband and myself to get his vasectomy reversed and take our chances because his vasectomy was "as bad as abortion" to them.
I'm easily turned off by overkill.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
GreyGirl
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,429
Location: In the world of pure imagination
This reminds me of The Simpsons "Whacking Day" episode
>>>>IMDb<<<<(def. of Whacking Day)
Couldn't find a video link.
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
Sea Kittens? I don't remember that name, this was 20 some odd years ago, but I did once have Sea Monkeys. They never turned into anything. $1.95 wasted!
I was once on an animal rights debate mailing list, and some of the people had some strange ideas. Not saying you do, but it's how some of the people were. I was told I shouldn't think of my dog as "my dog" but as "my companion". They also really pushed animal feed with no meat products or by products in it. I was not only supposed to think about my dog differently, I was supposed to turn him into a vegetarian! I know that every movement has it's fringes and I think thats what those were. I was invited to the list by a friend and didn't stay long. It was all pointless arguing. I could see trying to change people's actions, but trying to change their thoughts seemed a bit creepy to me.
PETA also turned down a proposal, years ago in some cold city, to work with them in getting those who used to own fur but are anti-fur now, to donate their coats to the homeless instead of to PETA to just ruin them in campaigns. It was stated that seeing bums walking around in fur would remove the glamour from it, and also would help keep people from freezing to death. It was reported that they turned them down and said they would get more results their way. I'll have to Google to find it, but if you'll remind me to, I will later on. I almost donated mine to them back then, but my mother convinced me to let her hold on to them. One was one bought by my husband for me and one was my grandmothers stole that she left me. I'm really glad I kept them, and I have them back now. Not that I go anywhere to wear them. But, I think it's heartless to let people die just to make a point.
Not arguing about PETA at all (or trying to start an argument or debate either) just conversation, and comparing notes I suppose.
I am still highly disappointed in the sea monkeys though.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
I was heckled today - again - by some PETA fanatics who were basically telling me I am worse than Hitler for occasionally eating meat. The fact that humans are omnivores seems completely lost on them.
Pretty sure vegetarians are still humans.
Icyclan: Why bring PETA into this (or the extreme exaggeration "worse than Hitler")? Their are many who don't support killing animals for entertainment that oppose PETA. Their are far bigger and longer standing welfare groups that take a completely different stance to PETA (who I take many issues with), but that oppose hunting too. Eg. the ASPCA: "The ASPCA is opposed to hunting animals for sport" - http://www.aspca.org/about-us/policy-po ... nting.aspx (which goes onto say "The ASPCA does recognize that wildlife management may be necessary in situations where animal and human interests collide...")
ValentineWiggin: huge respect for arguing as rationally as you have done through most of this thread. Icyclans statement that "humans are omnivores" included vegetarians though, at as far as I could tell. Vegetarian humans are omnivores as they are members of a species that is capable of deriving nutrition from animal flesh and organs if consumed and can also derive nutrition from plant foods (As a species we are also capable of killing each other for a wide range of reasons, clearly their is more of a disconnect between what individuals of the homo sapiens species are able to do vs members of that same species should regard as ethical than just what "we" may or may not eat, as such I consider humans being omnivores poor justification for not being a vegetarian, at least stated on its own as in the quote above)
^definitely this [+1]
Excuse you? Since when do I need to justify not being a vegetarian? Are you the universal arbiter who decides what's ethical or not? As I said, we are omnivores. Omnivorous species incorporate animal protein as part of a healthy diet. Only animal protein contains all 8 essential amino acids not found in plant protein. Since I didn't choose my digestive tract, the onus is on you to convince me why I shouldn't eat meat. And no, your subjective morals alone are not enough.
I was heckled today - again - by some PETA fanatics who were basically telling me I am worse than Hitler for occasionally eating meat. The fact that humans are omnivores seems completely lost on them.
Pretty sure vegetarians are still humans.
Icyclan: Why bring PETA into this (or the extreme exaggeration "worse than Hitler")? Their are many who don't support killing animals for entertainment that oppose PETA. Their are far bigger and longer standing welfare groups that take a completely different stance to PETA (who I take many issues with), but that oppose hunting too. Eg. the ASPCA: "The ASPCA is opposed to hunting animals for sport" - http://www.aspca.org/about-us/policy-po ... nting.aspx (which goes onto say "The ASPCA does recognize that wildlife management may be necessary in situations where animal and human interests collide...")
ValentineWiggin: huge respect for arguing as rationally as you have done through most of this thread. Icyclans statement that "humans are omnivores" included vegetarians though, at as far as I could tell. Vegetarian humans are omnivores as they are members of a species that is capable of deriving nutrition from animal flesh and organs if consumed and can also derive nutrition from plant foods (As a species we are also capable of killing each other for a wide range of reasons, clearly their is more of a disconnect between what individuals of the homo sapiens species are able to do vs members of that same species should regard as ethical than just what "we" may or may not eat, as such I consider humans being omnivores poor justification for not being a vegetarian, at least stated on its own as in the quote above)
^definitely this [+1]
Excuse you? Since when do I need to justify not being a vegetarian? Are you the universal arbiter who decides what's ethical or not? As I said, we are omnivores. Omnivorous species incorporate animal protein as part of a healthy dietCITATION NEEDED Only animal protein contains all 8 essential amino acids not found in plant protein. Since I didn't choose my digestive tract, the onus is on you to convince me why I shouldn't eat meat. And no, your subjective morals alone are not enough.
Please re-check what I wrote and who I said what to in the text of mind you quoted. I did not ask you do justify not being vegetarian. The onus is not on me to convince you of anything, I asked that you not bring your feelings about PETA into this as I don't think this is relevant and corrected another member whom I thought seemed to misunderstand you. If in a comment clearly directed at ValentineWiggin I implied that our moralities may have something in common with regard to choosing not to eat animals... well honestly.. how does that have anything to do with you?!
I have added "CITATION NEEDED" to a claim you have now made though. I think it is wrong and is a mis-understating of what constitutes an omnivore. An example of an omnivore that clearly not need to eat animal protein in it's regular diet is in the subject of the thread (ie. a squirrel).
The "essential" nature of 8 of the amino acids humans need, is not a property of digestion. These amino acids are "essential" because the human body can not synthesise these See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_amino_acid
I do not like soy as a food, but it is a plant food that naturally contains all 8 essential amino acids. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soy_protein#Nutrition
Also: as one can simply mix plant proteins from different commonly dietary plant sources to get foods that have all 8 essential amino acids (eg. rice and beans) I do not think that animal protein is essential in the human diet (convenient and tasty to some - sure I'll "give" you those, just NOT essential)
If you want to curse why the human digestive tract doesn't help you to be a vegetarian, you'd been better to have brought up vitamin B12 (B12 is made microbially not by animals, many animals get B12 from having these bacteria living in their digestive tract, a feat that does not seem to work in human physiology).
NB: the arguments about are not why you should or should not be vegetarian - it's simply that you now made some fallacious claim that I would like to correct
Since when am I not allowed to respond to things that are not directed at me personally? If you're saying to no one in particular that being an omnivore is no justification for not being a vegetarian, you're clearly implying there must be some sort of stipulation for eating meat; of course someone might call you on that. Now, I like animals a lot, and I strongly disagree with how many slaughterhouses treat their animals; I would never eat something like foie gras, or animals that were prepared by backward, cruel, Islamic ritual slaughter, just to name something. That doesn't mean I have to apologize for eating meat that was humanely slaughtered. Vegetarians can continue to live off of a diet of sunflower seeds and grass for all I care, I'm not chastising anyone for what they eat. Just don't expect me to share your eating habits.
And soy is garbage: it lowers testosterone, HDL cholesterol, raises estrogen and decreases protein synthesis. It may even be linked to prostate growth. Not to mention it tastes like cardboard. I know it has all the essential amino acids, but that's about the only thing it has going for it so I didn't mention it.