blitzkrieg wrote:
I agree that a person can have an informed opinion on a given topic without being a scientist, but it would be a lesser opinion from a layperson than it would be from someone qualified in a particular scientific field, who has the relevant expertise to have a genuinely informed opinion. And by genuine I mean having an advanced understanding, versus the usual basic or mediocre understanding of a layperson.
What’s relevant here isn’t having a degree (or degrees) but the time and energy one has devoted to research and being able to teach in an entertaining and, yet, informative way. Nye’s work is typically well-sourced. It’s not like he’s just spouting off whatever comes into his head when the mood strikes with no justification, not that even scientists are always perfect when it comes to that. They are human after all.
My point is that Nye is a great place to start if a person is new to science or a bit rusty. One can always do more research with the sources he provides or look elsewhere.
He’s inspired some kids to become scientists. For others, he opened the door to critical thinking even if their environment wasn’t otherwise conducive for it.
_________________
"I think Jesus was a compassionate, super-intelligent gay man who understood human problems.” — Elton John