b9 wrote:
<truncated to prevent giant quote>
Concerning the part about lawyers, he probably has the stereotype of the arguing lawyer and thinks he is practicing. From the detached perspective I have, it's obvious that the, "friend," is quite envious about your skills and is the real selfish prick.
About the firing, it might be wise to have some kind of witness, if only for the chance that he'll go berserk. If it requires a court, I doubt he'll be believable for long, but having a third person always helps.
[People who constantly assume they are better than everyone else because of something mediocre do nothing but provide no end of special interests that give me power to provide humiliation when the hubris becomes some kind of egomania.]
CockneyRebel wrote:
...Was I supposed to say something false and flaky such as this?...
"I love how spacious this room is going to look and I'm excited about the New Year and there are many things that I love about January and I can't get enough of it!"
I'd rather be real than flaky and I'm glad I told her what I did.
It's reassuring to know that there is some truthfulness and logic being used in conversations. I suppose that is an excellent benefit of AS.
I'm unhappy because I think the only reason for why I choose to read the scholarly articles about ASD's is to make myself think I'm more of a NT than a person on the spectrum. Maybe the stage of denial was delayed, and this, as opposed to reading a few shallow articles and thinking, "whew, I'm normal," is the true denial described by psychologists. I wonder about what mental state comes after denial..