IsabellaLinton wrote:
I'm not a neuroscientist but I'm going by what I've read.
I once heard boys get it from their mothers and girls get it from both, but now they seem to say mothers.
Mind you, that doesn't mean the child wouldn't be exposed to excellent learning opportunities from, or benefit by role-modelling after, their brilliant fathers too.
Who knows.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 45596.html The Independent is generally fairly okay in
reporting science but in this case they seem to be putting sensationalism before actual science. Media publications with articles written by journalists who interpret/quote science are in almost all cases, not scientists themselves and are subject to error in interpreting or even understanding at all, a scientific consensus.
An excerpt from the previous article I posted:
"So for biologically female individuals, one of your X chromosomes is coming from your dad, and in that case it is just as likely (going along with the unproven assertion that "intelligence genes" lie solely on the X chromosome) that any genetic coding for smarts comes from either parent’s X chromosome.
The three arguments used to make the claim about intelligence coming solely from your mother each fail as all-encompassing statements and rely on a flawed understanding of science, a misrepresentation of scientific consensus, or both. It is misleading, at best, to say that we know anything about which parent is (more) responsible for an offspring’s intelligence, let alone which genes."