DeepHour wrote:
I can't work up very much enthusiasm for the royal family or the monarchy, but the alternative of an elected president could be a lot worse. We could end up with a clapped out ex-politician like Blair or Clegg, or even some sort of 'celebrity' like Stephen Fry or Joanna Lumley.
Personally I don't mind either a monarch or a president as head of state, although I would prefer one based here for our country. That said, I'd like to see the details of any proposed changes before deciding on whether to support it or not.
One thing I do like about the current system though is having a head of state that's separated from the grind of elections and daily politics. Like you said, who knows what kind of person can win a popularity contest and end up as head of state? Look at Donald Trump, who as the US president was both head of state
and head of government.
DeepHour wrote:
Many older Brits seem to have a good deal of respect for the Queen, but hold the minor members of the family, like Prince Andrew or Prince Harry, in contempt. No idea what younger elements of society think, though I suspect they rate Harry quite highly because of his 'woke' credentials.
I suspect Prince Harry is regarded as a public figure and celebrity like most others, and little else. Prince William is a public figure as well but also a future leader, so he'll be judged by different standards. I imagine they'd both be more relatable to younger people due to their age more than their "wokeness". Especially when compared with Prince Charles, who has had his own moments of wokeness but isn't particularly popular among people of any age.
_________________
It is easy to go down into Hell;
Night and day, the gates of dark Death stand wide;
But to climb back again, to retrace one's steps to the upper air –
There's the rub, the task.
– Virgil, The Aeneid (Book VI)