hartzofspace wrote:
My BMI is 26.9. Overweight. Yet, I don't look fat at all. Just feminine and curvy. Well, I wouldn't take that this BMI to seriously, anyway. I would like to lose about 10 pounds, around my middle. But I look nice in clothes.
you know, the fact that a classic curvy feminine body is deemed overweight via those cheap bmi scales tells quite a bit, doesnt it? (well, besides that these cheapo scales arent of much use).
but the world out there indeed has a huge problem concerning beauty ideals. for one, a huge number of people seem to think that throwing the best features of each kind of hotness together will make uberbeauty. like, a flat, trained belly, gravity-defying breasts of around c-cup, a bubbly brazilian rear end and slim, trained legs. on top of that, i see a trend of trying to de-mystify things - in a bad way. if beauty can be reduced to numbers, then thats so great, because its so easy, isnt it? and finally, we know what beauty is, too...
i saw a show in tv yesterday, where a model coach (a most cute guy, his name is bruce darnell and hes the best thing to come out of america since donuts) meets up with a girl that is not content with herself and he tries to fix her up by giving tips on wardrobe, makeup, and mostly polishing up her ego. what can i say, there was a most beautiful girl with a slim figure crying on end because she thought herself to not be feminine enough because she "only" had breasts that were fitting with her overall slim curves. she even considered breast implants, which would have butchered her overall harmony.
i can see the same thing happening the other way round - a good-looking girl with a superb hourglass figure might rather believe a stupid number or completely twisted hotness trends instead of a good, honest look in the mirror.
aint that a really, really sad state?