Redxk wrote:
I have forgotten the difference between Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.
Same question.
The Mensheviks were liberal democrats who eschewed communism after coming to power peacefully earlier in 1917. Theirs was the true revolution of the people, the October Revolution being one of the elites. Given the Marxism of history pedagogy in the West today, it's not surprising that this isn't taught.
I guess the short answer to the question is that Russia would have achieved similar political preeminence to that which it did in fact achieve, and the Communist Revolution would have taken place in France or Germany, and ended with less bloodshed with the intervention of the British and Americans. People in the latter two countries, their good sense not deceived by the exoticism of the doctrine, would have recognised Marxism for the failure it was, instead of continuing to flirt with it as they do today.
Have you ever been to Avignon?