kraftiekortie wrote:
A person can be as smart as hell-----yet, despite all the arguments for his/her position, that person just might not be "right."
One can argue for the "righteousness" of almost anything----and "smart" people have. They can argue for the "righteousness" of some pretty egregious things.
I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed-----but I do believe I have a pretty decent, objective concept of what's "right" and what's "wrong."
That's true.
Idk anymore if tax dodging is the worse thing but it's still immoral. And if some team financially manipulates things, that does make it harder for other teams.
Just really hard to argue figures...
And that's the easy stuff to argue about from our POV.
It's just football arguing about something vaguely immoral. Becomes very mathematical very quick and goes over my head.
I use annoying to mean a bit like a bee sting or something. Not upsetting or damaging or anxiety inducing just... like a kid at a back of a car saying 'are we there yet' every five minutes.
_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him