KitLily wrote:
Yes, I think in the future, people will look back in horror and say 'they really made people stay alive even though they were ill, weak, unhappy? That's barbaric.'
At present humans are kept alive in conditions that we wouldn't keep an animal. Animals are humanely put down if they are suffering and won't recover, but humans have to struggle on.
If...IF...the human race survives to the 22nd century, assisted suicide will be normal and accepted by then.
I hope this is true, but I do wonder. What I mean is, acceptance of death requires quite a mature state of mind. You have to think about your own death for quite a while before you get there. I think Buddhists meditate on their deaths for this reason. The other time we do it is when we're seriously ill, physically or mentally - these are exceptional times, not the norm at all for most.
One of the functions of religion is to give us a framework for understanding death but in UK culture at least, and other places too I understand, we've pretty much abandoned religion.
So we have a culture where we don't look death in the eye, indeed we avoid thinking about it as much as possible. And that makes it unknown and something to be feared. I don't see that changing in the world we're building at the moment.
So I can't see how we get to a place where assisted suicide is an acceptable policy for any political party to propose. There might never be enough people with a mature enough mindset to support it, unless our attitudes to death change in some significant way.
_________________
The world is a big place where things happen almost every day.