I went to give blood today, so I had planned to do that, and due to some confusion, waiting and preparing for it took up quite a bit of my day. When I got there, I filled out the form, and had to tick yes to a couple of questions, including "Have you ever had a serious illness or seen a doctor about your heart?" Why on Earth they chose to merge those two questions into one I don't know. I have never had a serious illness (I interpreted this to mean one that required hospital care, although the form didn't define things like this), but I did go to see my GP about palpitations a while ago, as I used to suffer from anxiety, and they were freaking me out. I've just started considering myself recovered from anxiety problems. I then had to sit down and wait for a while before I spoke to a nurse to go through the form. I explained about the palpitations appointment, and that the GP found that there is nothing wrong with my heart: it's just caused by stress. She asked when this appointment was. I am very bad at knowing/guessing when things happened; my sense of time is rubbish, so that was awkward. She then asked when the last time I had palpitations was. I explained I'd had palpitations two days ago, nothing really bad, just a bit weird and uncomfortable. I was then told this prevents me from giving blood. To give blood, I will apparently have to be free of palpitations for six months. I'm not sure that'll ever happen.
I feel a bit annoyed, because loads of people probably have palpitations like the ones I have now (infrequent and mild), and the blood service just never know about it because those people haven't gone to a doctor about it. The other thing is, my blood is probably some of the safest out there. I'm a virgin, I don't travel abroad, I'm not on medication and I don't drink caffiene or alcohol. And others just lie and give blood, risking others. My friend feels a bit ill, maybe is getting a cold, but said that she didn't because she wanted to give blood. And though it's not serious, it means whoever recieves that blood will get a cold virus in them when they're already weak. I've known others use the blood service for a HIV test. And others just lie about their own health, so they don't have the problem I have - they overreact to any slight problem to protect you. I feel like my honesty has got me in trouble again.
The rules for this don't seem to make any sense. It's okay to give blood if you take medication, usually. I can't imagine that it's that good for the person recieving the blood to recieve a dose of someone else's medication. You can't give blood if you've ever had homosexual sex, not just 'with a new partner in the last 6 months' which would ensure the HIV test was valid. They never asked me if I suffer from dizzy spells or have ever fainted, although these would probably mean someone shouldn't give blood because they'd faint from the blood loss.
Ugh. Not enough logic.
_________________
"The only difference between myself and madman is I am not mad" - Salvador Dali