Page 1 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

12 Mar 2010, 4:17 pm

Post a random question.

Example: Would launching a catalytic nuclear reaction inhibitor into the sun be a bad idea?



Adventus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 264

12 Mar 2010, 4:29 pm

If air is clear and water is transparent why is the sky blue?



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

12 Mar 2010, 4:34 pm

Adventus wrote:
If air is clear and water is transparent why is the sky blue?


Because higher frequency light tends to act more like a particle than lower frequency light.



bully_on_speed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 890

12 Mar 2010, 4:47 pm

take how much wood a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood divided by how many sea shells sally sold down by the sea shore



Ambivalence
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)

12 Mar 2010, 6:01 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Example: Would launching a catalytic nuclear reaction inhibitor into the sun be a bad idea?


No. My guess would be that maybe, if you could dismantle Jupiter, convert it entirely into iron and dump the whole lot into the Sun's core it would mess things up a little, but I don't think it'd do anything so dramatic as to put the Sun out. And if you can dismantle Jupiter, you don't really need to worry about the state of the Sun.


_________________
No one has gone missing or died.

The year is still young.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,591
Location: the island of defective toy santas

12 Mar 2010, 10:13 pm

warning for folks who don't like adult topics, STOP READING HERE!
random question below the asterisks*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
what darwinian purpose does homosexuality serve? it is as old as humanity, so its continued existence down to the modern day must be for reasons related to natural selection. "enquiring minds want to know."



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

12 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm

Are we allowed to post answers or just questions? :-P

auntblabby: I had a theory that homosexuality kicked in when populations got too large for the available resources. I got shouted at for voicing that. I can't find anything that supports this theory.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


bully_on_speed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 890

12 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm

auntblabby wrote:
warning for folks who don't like adult topics, STOP READING HERE!
random question below the asterisks*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
what darwinian purpose does homosexuality serve? it is as old as humanity, so its continued existence down to the modern day must be for reasons related to natural selection. "enquiring minds want to know."



im thinking its a preperation for another evolutanary step wither omnisexuality or bigger stool. its a toss up which



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,591
Location: the island of defective toy santas

12 Mar 2010, 11:49 pm

bully_on_speed wrote:
"...bigger stool. "


droll. very droll :lol:



pat2rome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Location: Georgia

12 Mar 2010, 11:53 pm

bully_on_speed wrote:
im thinking its a preperation for another evolutanary step wither omnisexuality or bigger stool. its a toss up which


That doesn't make sense, though. Evolution isn't a conscious process.


_________________
I'm never gonna dance again, Aspie feet have got no rhythm.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,591
Location: the island of defective toy santas

12 Mar 2010, 11:56 pm

pat2rome wrote:
bully_on_speed wrote:
im thinking its a preperation for another evolutanary step wither omnisexuality or bigger stool. its a toss up which


That doesn't make sense, though. Evolution isn't a conscious process.


he was being facetious :lol:



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,360
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

12 Mar 2010, 11:59 pm

Is there such a colour as clear?


_________________
The Family Enigma


bully_on_speed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 890

13 Mar 2010, 1:11 am

pat2rome wrote:
bully_on_speed wrote:
im thinking its a preperation for another evolutanary step wither omnisexuality or bigger stool. its a toss up which


That doesn't make sense, though. Evolution isn't a conscious process.


or is it? mirco evolution. simply doing better than the day before.


serious answer to the homosexual question. its a theory in evolution a "thinning" of the herd, an arguing point of people against homosexuals is that they cant breed, ergo no evolved traits passed on to the next generation. homosexuality is a genetic trigger to have you not breed



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,591
Location: the island of defective toy santas

13 Mar 2010, 1:21 am

bully_on_speed wrote:
serious answer to the homosexual question. its a theory in evolution a "thinning" of the herd, an arguing point of people against homosexuals is that they cant breed, ergo no evolved traits passed on to the next generation. homosexuality is a genetic trigger to have you not breed


still not an answer to the original question- why does it persist down through the ages to the present? despite the fact that gay folk don't reproduce the old-fashioned way, why are there still homosexuals being born in the first place? there has to be a function to it, some purpose being fulfilled, e.g., are gayfolk helping to insure the survival of other groups? somebody knows the answer to this.



sketches
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 326
Location: Everywhere you want to be

13 Mar 2010, 6:09 am

For the homosexuality question, I swear that it would just be a genetic mutation, if anything. No purpose. On top of that, these days since the 60s/70s/80s, lots of cultures have grown highly accepting and more socially "experimental." I do think that because of our change in culture, homosexuality is a "nurture" thing (I might even say homosexual tendencies, such as lisps and fashion sense, are man-made). On top of THAT, performing homosexual acts, basically, still "get the job done," which explains its continuation over a lengthy period of time. I don't have any official information to back up my theories, either, besides other theories, maybe. Overall, I believe it has no purpose at all, especially no evolutionary purpose.

My question is a stupid one: Why does 0 count as a number? (I understand to call 0 a digit. But a number used for counting?)


_________________
~


PLA
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,929
Location: Sweden

13 Mar 2010, 7:36 am

auntblabby wrote:
bully_on_speed wrote:
serious answer to the homosexual question. its a theory in evolution a "thinning" of the herd, an arguing point of people against homosexuals is that they cant breed, ergo no evolved traits passed on to the next generation. homosexuality is a genetic trigger to have you not breed


still not an answer to the original question- why does it persist down through the ages to the present? despite the fact that gay folk don't reproduce the old-fashioned way, why are there still homosexuals being born in the first place? there has to be a function to it, some purpose being fulfilled, e.g., are gayfolk helping to insure the survival of other groups? somebody knows the answer to this.

Could just be a side-effect.

sketches wrote:
For the homosexuality question, I swear that it would just be a genetic mutation, if anything. No purpose. On top of that, these days since the 60s/70s/80s, lots of cultures have grown highly accepting and more socially "experimental." I do think that because of our change in culture, homosexuality is a "nurture" thing (I might even say homosexual tendencies, such as lisps and fashion sense, are man-made). On top of THAT, performing homosexual acts, basically, still "get the job done," which explains its continuation over a lengthy period of time. I don't have any official information to back up my theories, either, besides other theories, maybe. Overall, I believe it has no purpose at all, especially no evolutionary purpose.

My question is a stupid one: Why does 0 count as a number? (I understand to call 0 a digit. But a number used for counting?)

It's very useful.


_________________
I can make a statement true by placing it first in this signature.

"Everyone loves the dolphin. A bitter shark - emerging from it's cold depths - doesn't stand a chance." This is hyperbol.

"Run, Jump, Fall, Limp off, Try Harder."