psychohist wrote:
jc6chan wrote:
In bold: There is no such thing as poorly spoken language. Its all relative. If someone has bad grammar, its "bad" because it doesn't follow the norm of how others speak.
I'd argue that not following norms is somewhat bad in and of itself. The purpose of language is to communicate, and failing to follow norms makes misunderstanding more likely.
Also, accepting the breakage of firm rules of a language will lead to too much diversity in how we speak, making it gradually exorbitantly more difficult for people from different localities or subcultures to understand one another.
I fully support giving leeway when people break the rules of a language accidentally, but I do not support considering the incorrect syntax to be correct by any measure. Although, there's sort of a line to it. Language will change slowly over time anyways, but if it gets too fast, it would be all the more painful to people just trying to understand one another, since there will be different branches to the changes, especially as greater differences to language syntax are readily accepted as correct.
AAVE is it's own thing from that I guess, but I still rather dislike it. I don't always dislike the people using it, but I do dislike AAVE itself. Needless to say, I don't tend to vocalize that much with people that use it unless they're my friends and I know they would be understanding of it if I said so.
_________________
Semi-colons are awesome; you are awesome if you use them.
I enjoy random PMs. ^.^