Poppycocteau wrote:
. . . people write a different version of a word that is almost the same, but not quite? For instance, I have seen people write 'sammich', which presumably means 'sandwich' . . . but what does it imply? It's not short for sandwich, because both words have two syllables, and if the original term - sandwich - can be used to the same effect, what is the point of it?
I think the variation "sammich" is simply a regional dialect, the same way people in Boston would say "cah" instead of car.
Poppycocteau wrote:
There are lots of things like this. Similarly, I have never understood why people called Robert sometimes are referred to as 'Bob'. I could understand 'Rob' . . . but why Bob? Why substitute the R for a B? Why not substitute it for a T and call him Tob? Or call him Bert, but instead of Bert . . . Tert, which seems to follow the same logic.
See if
this page might help answer your question. It depends on whether or not you trust Yahoo Answers, though.
Poppycocteau wrote:
Because I find such things set off odd trains of thought like this, I hate the writing that comes with those photos of cats doing 'amusing' things, like wearing a cap. It reads in my head as lots of unpleasant noises, and I have no understanding of what inference I'm supposed to take from the fact that everything is spelled incorrectly. Is it supposed to represent how good the cat might be at spelling if it was really gifted as far as cats go? Or does it somehow represent the imaginary voice of the cat? Or am I just reading far too much into everything as usual?
I'm not sure of what you're asking with this question.
_________________
What fresh hell is this?