Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

MirrorWars
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 546

27 Aug 2012, 6:28 pm

Do you remember those magic-eye pictures that were so popular in magazines & newspapers, back in the mid 90's?

Well my question is: Could any of you see the "hidden" image supposedly contained within those pictures?

The reason I ask, is, that I never could. So I'm wandering if there is a good reason for this.

I'm thinking that:

a) - They are complete & utter BS ( a kind of Emperor's new clothes, thing ).

b) - They are legit, but I ( for whatever reason ) can't see them.

What's the deal?



invisiblesilent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,150

27 Aug 2012, 6:32 pm

They are legit. After learning the trick of seeing them I was able to look at an image I had not seen before, see the 3d picture and *then* check what I had seen against the non magic eye 2d version at the back of the book I had. I wish I could explain the trick to you but I don't think I can explain it adequately. I probably place the picture maybe 20cm from my eye and then drastically overfocus and underfocus my eyes on the image. At the sweet spot the image becomes quite obvious. Some people just seem unable to do them :(



MirrorWars
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 546

27 Aug 2012, 6:39 pm

Interesting. I wonder if it's because I have a squint, that I couldn't see them?

Would you still be able to see the image if you had on eye closed, do you think?

If so, then my squint theory is probably wrong.



lostgirl1986
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,418
Location: Ontario, Canada

27 Aug 2012, 7:09 pm

I did but it took a lot of practice until I could finally see them. It wasn't until my brother bought a book of them and I practiced at home. The ways that would usually work for me was to stare at the middle of the picture up close and slowly draw my face back or to cross my eyes while staring at the middle of the picture for as long as possible until I saw the 3D image.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

27 Aug 2012, 7:28 pm

MirrorWars wrote:
Would you still be able to see the image if you had on eye closed, do you think?

Definitely not, they require binocular vision.



Aprilviolets
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,107

27 Aug 2012, 8:34 pm

I could never see the "Hidden image" it just looked like a mess of colours to me.



Webalina
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 787
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

27 Aug 2012, 10:31 pm

It takes some getting used to, but once you do it the first time you can always do it. An earlier poster is right -- it's easier to do than to explain. If you've ever gone into a stare while zoning out, you just need to do the same thing when looking at the pictures.



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

27 Aug 2012, 10:46 pm

yellowtamarin wrote:
MirrorWars wrote:
Would you still be able to see the image if you had on eye closed, do you think?

Definitely not, they require binocular vision.
Yep. The reason you can see a 3-D image in a Magic Eye picture (part of the image seems to "float" above the rest, usually) is that you can diverge or converge your eyes more than you would if you focused on the page. Instead of each eye getting the same image, they get slightly different images that can be interpreted as different views of a three-dimensional object, and so your brain interprets it as three-dimensional. It's the same principle as 3-D glasses, except that with the glasses, the difference between the two eyes is produced by blocking some of the light coming into each eye, so that two slightly different viewpoints are available. Don't bother yourself about it if you can't control your eyes well enough to focus them on a spot beyond the page and see the illusion--it's not like it's a fundamental aspect of anybody's existence, right? Well, perhaps a fundamental part of the guy who made a fortune selling Magic Eye books, but other than that, probably not. :lol:


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

27 Aug 2012, 11:22 pm

I can get them into 3D, but with a problem: the bits that are meant to appear concave appear convex, and vice versa.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Artsieaspie
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 4

28 Aug 2012, 12:13 am

i've never been able to see those things. i have fairly severe astigmatism, so that's what i use as my excuse. :)



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

28 Aug 2012, 12:24 am

Who_Am_I wrote:
I can get them into 3D, but with a problem: the bits that are meant to appear concave appear convex, and vice versa.

Have you tried moving the page around a bit, tilting it etc. (or moving your head)? You might need the extra movement cue to see it correctly.



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

28 Aug 2012, 12:31 am

I cross my eyes to see the images and it makes me see them. I used to have troubles and it took lot of concentration until I started to cross my eyes and bam the image would appear. It's been easy ever since.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Rascal77s
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

28 Aug 2012, 12:35 am

I've always seen these images almost immediately from the time I saw my 1st one. I don't know why and not sure how I do it but there's definitely adjustment in the muscles that control the eyes.



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

28 Aug 2012, 3:25 am

yellowtamarin wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
I can get them into 3D, but with a problem: the bits that are meant to appear concave appear convex, and vice versa.

Have you tried moving the page around a bit, tilting it etc. (or moving your head)? You might need the extra movement cue to see it correctly.


I'll try it.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


outofplace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,771
Location: In A State of Quantum Flux

28 Aug 2012, 3:29 am

I could see them just fine. However, it usually took me relaxing and focusing intently on the picture for a little bit before it came into focus.


_________________
Uncertain of diagnosis, either ADHD or Aspergers.
Aspie quiz: 143/200 AS, 81/200 NT; AQ 43; "eyes" 17/39, EQ/SQ 21/51 BAPQ: Autistic/BAP- You scored 92 aloof, 111 rigid and 103 pragmatic


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

28 Aug 2012, 3:29 am

(Thread moved from Autism discussion to Random)

It took me a long while to discover the technique of how to look at them. I can spot the hidden images in seconds now. They are brilliant! :)