funeralxempire wrote:
Mikah wrote:
The term has been destroyed. I appreciate many things but when splat painting, Piss Christ and the works of paint-enema-man are considered art in supposedly serious circles I cannot honestly say "I like art".
Don't you just like
other art?
We all have styles we appreciate and others we don't.
Only by the modern definition, which I reject. The modern definition is pretty much "if someone wants to call it art, it is art". So everything can be art.
My own personal definition of art excludes (not exhaustively):
- Items or performances mainly designed to induce disgust or sexual arousal. Pornography is not art. Piss Christ is not art.
- Anything that requires no skill, talent or real effort beyond what an ordinary person could pull off.
- Anything a layman could not reasonably recognise as art without formal education in the topic. How many lay people could realistically distinguish between "masterpieces" of abstract expressionism and something an angry seven year old could create given the same materials?
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!