iMark wrote:
i hate them.
they inspire unreasonable expectations in women: unrealistically romantic, overly melodramatic, all about female empowerment, with a happily ever after ending - except "Thelma & Louise."
if chick flicks reflect real life, then all women are interested only in shopping, girls night out, and acquiring a man they do not have or getting rid of the one they do - usually both. also, chick flicks portray a woman in such a way that deep down inside she only an awkward, uncertain ugly duckling who blossoms into the fulness of her womanhood only in the presence of the one man who is her true soul mate - usually someone she has never even considered in that way before.
if chick flicks reflect real life, then all men are either bumbling buffoons, lecherous slobs, self-absorbed narcissists, clueless loners, or insensitive louts, and only the love of a woman can turn him into a prince charming. also, chick flicks portray men in such a way that they only function to either antagonize a woman into becoming stronger or to make her deleriously happy by becoming her own personal love-puppy.
QFT.
I never could relate to them as I could with some movies that I don't consider chick-ish flicks like Fried Green Tomatoes.
I could relate so strongly with characters in that movie by two leading females that I could with a bunch of girls shopping for stilletos and worrying about middle age and not getting the right kind of guy before it's too late.
_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan