The only article I see come up at PubMed when typing in "candida autism" is not in a major publication, but is in one called "Alternative Medicine Review" that is put out by a company (Thorne) that makes and sells alternative meds for people and animals. Thorne's been in business since 1984, according to their website. They are now doing business out of Idaho. According to the Idaho IDSOS website, they filed as a corporation there in 1990, and also filed a similar business for veterinary products in 1999 (that corporation was subsequently disolved). The company was originally incorporated in 1984 in the State of Washington. They deal in diet supplements and other such items. The company is run by Al and Kelly Czap (see here for info http://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/c ... lue=C92303
I did a search on the author of that article, PM Kidd, and can't find him there being published in any major legitimate journal after 1985 - he's publishing solely in AMR according to PubMed. His journal cite seems to indicate he is associated with UC Berkeley, but I do not find a PM (Parris M) Kidd at UCB. He says in other materials he earned his PhD in Cell Biology from UCB. From a google search, I find that he is running a consulting company dealing with nutrition as treatment for disease, having walked away from academics in 1983 after becoming disenchanged with his postdoc work on rodent heart diseases and being unable to survive in the academic research sphere.
I did a search for him in the scholarly publications citations index and find that they do not list publications for him from 1986 until 2003. Prior work appears to be related to the immune system, and is usually co-authored. The Citations Index does show that he has an article published on nutrition in autism in "Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine" in 2003, but it has never been cited by other researchers.
In doing a general google search on Parris Kidd I find him only published in popular press, where he seems to be making the rounds of talk shows and selling non-scientific books on a variety of health-related topics.
He either believes in what he's doing or he's shilling a gullible public and making a mint off the "alternative medicine" circuit. There's no way to tell from here. But his record, above, does not exactly instill confidence in me that he's a legitimate researcher onto anything of substance. If he was, believe me, other researchers would be both citing and stealing his research to an absolutely astounding degree.