Some of these are vague subjective observations, in large part, and convey little hard info... Aspies work best with specifics...
Hermien wrote:
What strikes me:
- my relationships with aspi's are intense, having an intense relationship with a same-sex person differs from having it with opposite-sex person.
Why do you call it intense? Emotionally? Intellectually? Conversationally? What?
Quote:
- it just scares me when I read the complains from aspi women who say they are taken advantage off. For some reason Aspi women appear more vulnerable.
All Aspies, because we are unaware of non-verbal cues, are at risk for being taken advantage of by unscrupulous scum. Women, in general, ARE more vulnerable in our society... all women. But I literally can't tell the difference between someone who is being polite, and someone who is genuinely friendly on the first take... it's lead to some hurt feelings on my part when someone I thought was a friend was really just being polite.
Quote:
- they have a different view on children than aspi men have.
Again, be specific. This statement really conveys nothing.
Quote:
- the mirroring made me feel as if she were my sister.
Do you mean she is mimicking you? That's seems to me a more individual thing... I don't mimic others. I think there is a type of woman--NT and AS--who is more...ummm, passive? undifferentiated as a protective strategy, some men find it flattering I suspect. But there have been NT women on these boards who complain their husbands have no opinions of their own...
And there seem to be plenty of Aspie women running around here who have plenty of opinions... LOL
Quote:
- they are mothers!
And this means what? Other than a biological fact. Your point is?
Quote:
There may be nothing special, but when women write about their aspi men, I get bored, cannot identify, especially when it is about intimacy.
I think there is probably a general difference, just like there's a general difference between men and women regardless of culture. Different mental aptitudes are well documented in the two brains, men being better at spatial mapping (hunting), women better at small relational details (gathering), men more prone to fact based info, women more prone to feeling tone info... I suspect the AS versions of these would tend to accentuate certain characteristics.
For example, because women as a whole are more relationally based, it's really no surprise that an AS girl would be automatically be inclined to observing how groups of people relate to one another, and mimic it, thus being better able to 'pass' detection.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that the two minds are adept at picking out different sorts of patterns as well...